Subject:
|
Re: Bug in L3PAO when path deleted/renamed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:47:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1053 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad, Jeff Boen wrote:
> sure, I can do that.. I've pretty much abandoned dealing with the .ini because
> so many people have complained about having to load LDAO to use my apps, but
> adding it in is no problem.
The reason I decided to stick with an INI file in LDAO (besides already
having a library object for it) is because it would be easier to share the
settings between all LCAD-ish programs.
And because it's easier for humans to hack a text file than the Windows
Registry.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bug in L3PAO when path deleted/renamed
|
| (...) sure, I can do that.. I've pretty much abandoned dealing with the .ini because so many people have complained about having to load LDAO to use my apps, but adding it in is no problem. J (24 years ago, 25-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|