Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:09:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
34200 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Tim Gould wrote:
>
> > I'm afraid we are prioritising new users over those from the 1980s.
> > What with it being 2011 and all it seemed the right time ;)
>
> Yes, why stay with obsolete methods that are 300-3000% more efficient for
> reading text messages, why stay with 'one click reads everything' when we
> can use the much more modern 'upmty-eleven clicks may find everything but
> you will probably never know for sure', why use 'get it all and read at your
> leisure' when we can have 'get one and hope you can find your way to the
> next and the internet connection will stay up for your next click'?
I do share your frustration, but if the new, slower and much more inefficient
way to navigate through the forum threads really will attract new users, I will
not stand in its way. I'll give it some time and hope for improvements that will
hopefully make it almost as user-friends and easy to browse as LUGNET is.
(Btw, IMO Swebricks or whatever it is called is as user-hostile as the forum at
ldraw.org.)
/Tore
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw.org 2011-01 Parts Update Now Available
|
| (...) Yes, why stay with obsolete methods that are 300-3000% more efficient for reading text messages, why stay with 'one click reads everything' when we can use the much more modern 'upmty-eleven clicks may find everything but you will probably (...) (15 years ago, 6-Aug-11, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
