Subject:
|
Re: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:03:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1046 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Andreas Maier wrote:
> > I would like it even better if MLCAD was honoring a LPub
> > meta command in the model that defines the camera
> > position and orientation. After all, it is a model
> > thing and not an installation wide thing.
>
> We agree that MLCad.ini is a good thing to get information from, as
> long as we know that that is happening.
I haven't been able to keep up with this whole discussion, (sorry)
but one thing struck me.
Once upon a time we tried to put this sort of global config stuff in
the generic ldraw.ini file instead an app specific file like mlcad.ini.
Here's an old disscusion of the [Views] section of ldraw.ini file.
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/mlcad/?n=1064
I'd consider saving the path to lsynth and lpub in the [Ldraw] section
of ldraw.ini. Put view matrices in the [View] section and consider
making new sections for [Lsynth] and [Lpub] specific settings. That
way other apps like LDDP can find the settings (and any new config
files) lsynth or lpub might need nowadays.
Just a thought,
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Some comments on the LPub 2.2.0.9 beta
|
| (...) Before we start, lets talk a bit about where I'm going with LPub. When I release the next LPub, it will also be going open source, as promised. LPub would be better suited to a larger develoment team. Through these conversations, you have (...) (20 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
