Subject:
|
Re: Another question about LPub PLIs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:04:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
895 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Joel Hoornbeek wrote:
> <snip>
>
> Hello again,
> I've come up with something else that I thought I'd mention. I ran my file
> through LPub last night, with the minimum distance for the steps set at 100000
> (which, by the way, seems to be about what I need to fix my scale problems), and
> the minimum distance for the parts images was set to 75000. However, the parts
> images came out much smaller than the pictures of the parts in the model. I
> started re-rendering them this morning at a lesser m.d., and realized that the
> parts images seem to be rendered in a window that's either 640x480 or 800x600.
> This isn't a problem, since I don't really want/need the parts images for my
> project to be the same size as the parts in the step images. I just thought I'd
> mention it as something you may want to look at.
What is it that you think is an issue here? At print resolution I think I use
800x600. At screen resolution I think I use 640x480.
Are you seeing it switch back and forth while jus staying in screen resolution?
>
> Also, as I was reviewing the images from last night's rendering, I noticed some
> unexpected behavior with the BI BEGIN GREYED command. I have been using it in
> conjunction with ML-cad's Buffer Exchange, and I have one step where only the
> parts inside the BI BEGIN and BI END pair are greyed out; all other parts
> (including parts added in previous steps) are their normal, unshaded colors.
> The steps before and after are both shaded correctly. I then have another step
> farther on in the model where I use that command, and all parts for that step
> and all following steps are shaded.
> Are there any problems with nesting LPub meta-statements? I usually use the BI
> statements inside a PLIST BEGIN IGN/PLIST END pair. Have you ever encountered
> situations like either of these two?
PLIST BEGIN/END pair should not contain a step, rotstep or buffer exchange.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> -Joel
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Another question about LPub PLIs
|
| (...) I'm rendering at 2048x1536, so the size that the step images end up at when the minimum distance is 75000 is different to that of the parts images when they are rendered at 640x480 and a minimum distance of 75000. No, I am not seeing it switch (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Another question about LPub PLIs
|
| <snip> Hello again, I've come up with something else that I thought I'd mention. I ran my file through LPub last night, with the minimum distance for the steps set at 100000 (which, by the way, seems to be about what I need to fix my scale (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
