Subject:
|
Re: Question about LPub PLIs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 03:47:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Joel Hoornbeek wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad, Joel Hoornbeek wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok, I've saved the first POV file that was generated. Here is the camera
> > section of the code; I had specified a minimum distance of 75000:
> >
> > // Camera (Latitude,Longitude,Radius = 0,0,0)
> > camera {
> > #declare PCT = 0; // Percentage further away
> > #declare STEREO = 0; // Normal view
> > //#declare STEREO = degrees(atan2(1,12))/2; // Left view
> > //#declare STEREO = -degrees(atan2(1,12))/2; // Right view
> > location vaxis_rotate(<0,2.55207,-51858.9> + PCT/100.0*<0,0,-51858.9>,
> > <0,-2.68935e+009,0>,STEREO)
>
> I would have thought that the <0,2.55207,-51858.9> was the camera distance,
> but taking the square root of the squares of these numbers is less than 75000,
> so I would have expected it to be 75000.
>
> Are you using mega-pov? Someone reported that mega-pov was broken in this area.
>
> Kevin
<snip>
Yes, I'm using POV-Ray 3.1 with MegaPOV 0.7.
-Joel
P.S. Thanks for your very quick responses to my posts!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question about LPub PLIs
|
| (...) I would have thought that the <0,2.55207,-51858.9> was the camera distance, but taking the square root of the squares of these numbers is less than 75000, so I would have expected it to be 75000. Are you using mega-pov? Someone reported that (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
