| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
Michael Lachmann <m.lachmann@xpoint.at> wrote in message news:FnyBpI.5HD@lugnet.com... (...) In my other life, I write what is essentially a plug-in for mechanical CAD systems. I also use plug-ins in other applications, like PageMaker. The common (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | anyone got a cutlass ???
|
|
I'm trying to make some images of pirate minifigs (using LDraw), and I was wondering if anyone out there has done a ".DAT" file for the Pirate Cutlass and would be willing to let me use that DAT file. Thanks. Franklin Franklin W. Cain | (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw Question
|
|
I am copying this to lugnet.cad because the CAD folks may or may not follow the lugnet.robotics group. (...) Eric Kingsley The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: ldraw reference
|
|
Tom, it is really annoying when you post personal messages to Lugnet. Oh, and do you think you could be considerate enough to use CAPS and a signature, considering that those are things that were part of Jonathan W almost getting kicked off Lugnet?? (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
|
(...) Parts (...) I noticed part 3943, 4x4x2 cone. Partsref (and other places that have it) show it with an axle hole through the top. While I've never seen the shown version myself, the 2 grey ones in 924 may have an axle shape recessed in the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | ldraw reference
|
|
hey tim what gives dude? i send you a huge chunk of ldraw reference html. where be it at? (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
I'm happy to hear the general agreement for plug-ins. I agree defining a standard, valid for other programs too, would be the best scenario. The idea to choin the plug-in into the rendering pipe-line is a good idea, but has to be well defined. I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Love the idea! I think something like this is just what we need to be able to consolidate cad utilities into one easy to use interface. For example, there could be L2P and L3P plugins written so you can access them from MLCad in a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Parts Updates News
|
|
Dear L-CAD'ers: I'm posting this quick FYI so that everyone knows what my plans are for the next parts update. I've currently got 70 files for the 2000-01 update. All the new parts, primitives, and file fixes submitted since the 99-06 voting was (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
|
(...) Please Do!!! -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: BlockCAD version 2.1 is out!
|
|
Anders Isaksson wrote ... (...) For the past two years I have been playing with making an LDraw compatible drawing program, so I can appreciate your effort. I know you have made some trade-offs, but it is impressing anyway. /Lars (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Pentapterigoid Star Fighter wallpaper
|
|
(...) I'm joking. You'd probably need to buy about a dozen sets (random number) to build this model. I haven't even built the box, just raytraced it. That would be an awesome project, though--to create an entire set, including all the artwork, (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: Pentapterigoid Star Fighter wallpaper
|
|
(...) Awe, c'mon, you'll spoil all my fun ;) --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies)
|
|
(...) Yes it really is - and yes I have two in white. Chris (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | MLCAD 1.7 Release2
|
|
Hi, I'm a newby and isn't familiar to any drawing system that we have at this moment. I made today my first model with MLCAD, witch is great, but every coin has a back side. some remarks: 1)Personally, i find the help file not enough detailed on how (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
|
| | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies)
|
|
(...) That's the set I got mine from as well. The rocketbase set was perhaps my most desired set during my early childhood that I didn't end up getting. - chris (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies)
|
|
(...) Yup I've just checked it (I have two of the cones from the 725 freight train) (URL) the cone is three bricks tall, the size 4x4x3 is correct. -Frank (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Re: 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies)
|
|
(...) I do, but it's back at my mom's house in the SF Bay Area, and I'm here in sunny Cambridge, MA. If memory serves, it is indeed three bricks tall. It's a cool piece, and I'm surprised TLC has never brought it back, since they seem to have a (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | 4x4x3 cone! (was: Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies)
|
|
(...) Whoa! Wow! (URL) learn somethin' new about LEGO every day! :) --Todd p.s. Question: Was it really 3 standard bricks tall (most likely) or perchance was it just shy or just over 3 tall? Anyone got one for real? (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.build)
|
|
| | Part 30358: SW Landspeeder Engine
|
|
Hi folx, I recently discovered that I've had this part 95% complete for a while now. I don't have time (nor will I in the forseeable future) to complete it, so I was wondering if any competent parts authors would like to finish it off. If anyone is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|