Subject:
|
Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 06:08:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1768 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm happy to hear the general agreement for plug-ins. I agree defining a
standard, valid for other programs too, would be the best scenario.
The idea to choin the plug-in into the rendering pipe-line is a good idea,
but has to be well defined.
I must say, until now I never played around with plug-ins at all, so there
goes my expirence with such things :-(
That is wy I ask what you would like, and suggested some things I could
imagine to be implemented quickly, at least this methode would open the way
for import/export plug-ins for converting into various file-formats ...
But as I sayed I'm open to good ideas ....
Michael
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
| Michael Lachmann <m.lachmann@xpoint.at> wrote in message news:FnyBpI.5HD@lugnet.com... (...) In my other life, I write what is essentially a plug-in for mechanical CAD systems. I also use plug-ins in other applications, like PageMaker. The common (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Suggestion for MLCad Plug-Ins
|
| (...) [snip] (...) Love the idea! I think something like this is just what we need to be able to consolidate cad utilities into one easy to use interface. For example, there could be L2P and L3P plugins written so you can access them from MLCad in a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
