 | | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
--snip-- (...) Adding a beta meta (hehehe) would be a nice way to deal with parts that have enough votes to be released but haven't made it to an official release. Tim (16 years ago, 7-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) Ah-ha! I thought that we were talking about random unofficial parts culled form the ether. But if LDraw's at the wheel, then how about including something like "BETA" in the unofficial part's description: Brick 2 x 4 (BETA) That would add only (...) (16 years ago, 7-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) Ah--I get it. I was thinking that it would be sufficient to include it somewhere in the hidden text of the file, but if we're talking about the actual part name, then I can see how that might not work. Dave! (16 years ago, 7-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Render Effects, (Was: Re: L3P Question)
|
|
(...) The color doesn't seem to have a large impact; ambient, diffuse, phong, phong_size, reflection, refraction and ior have. (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDCalc 0.1.0.4 released
|
|
I have just finished version 0.1.0.4 of LDCalc. The changes are: Option Tab If you change the number of digits that should be used all values are recalculated immediately. Triangle Tab Fixed the error if you changed to another tab and back again and (...) (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO update
|
|
(...) It turns out these issues were fixed in the latest POV-Ray beta. Sorry for the false report. -Mike (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Posable minifigs
|
|
When I'm done with my current project I think I will see about starting to create a bones system for LDraw minifigs so that they can be posed in a manner similar to a lot of official Lego software. I think I will do this in Daz, which AFAIK is free (...) (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO update
|
|
(...) I've tested them with PTViewer and Panorado (both Java apps), but I think I will make the switch to PanoSalado (Flash) since Flash is supported by Photobucket. -Mike (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Render Effects, (Was: Re: L3P Question)
|
|
(...) Your bulbs have a yellow tint, which may cause the "glow" to be more apparent. It has been suggested to me elsewhere to use HDR, so I might try that. -Mike (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 4.0 Beta 1 Released ***
|
|
Bravo! Thank you very much for the great improvement! Although not specifically listed, it fixed several bugs the older versions had for me. The background color chart always appeared in the background and the preferences menu never disappeared once (...) (16 years ago, 6-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Blender to LDraw exporter (Blend2Dat v0.2)
|
|
(...) export script still available for download somewhere? (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) It's not all that rare, and becoming less rare all the time... (...) The UI could display a small "unofficial" icon beside unofficial parts in what part tree/list/pallette is offered by the software. Steve (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) I believe that MLCad scans all files in unofficial directories at startup. So having a whole bunch of parts in unofficial directories slows down startup, but allows the directories to be used without having to rescan for parts every time a new (...) (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) Part names have a maximum length of 64 characters. Some rare parts run up against this limit. Consequently, I don't think adding "Official" to official part names is a viable solution. (To be honest, it would also by really annoying to see (...) (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Multiple instances of CAMERA.DAT and LOOK_AT.DAT
|
|
(...) If there were a real camera dat file that included facing information, look_at.dat would then be unnecessary, and the pairing problem would go away. --Travis (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Tool to reconstruct models from POV files
|
|
(...) I wasn't trying to give you a guilt trip. You asked for "potential problems", and I saw that as one of them. I apologize if I came across as implying that it was a bigger "potential problem" than it really is. --Travis (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Render Effects, (Was: Re: L3P Question)
|
|
(...) Did you look at my render? (URL) say there is a definite glow in the lights there. It's all a matter of reflection and refraction. (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) I see your point. However, in this case (AFAIK) he is using unofficial parts that have been uploaded to ldraw.org. These files are just as much under our "control" as the official parts. Further, if the model in question does not correspond to (...) (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO update
|
|
(...) Philo (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
|
|
(...) I would suggest that the "official" elements should have "official" in their descriptions, instead. "Unofficial" elements can come from any of a zillion sources impossible to oversee, but the "official" elements come from a single, (...) (16 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
