To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 15810
15809  |  15811
Subject: 
Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 03:51:15 GMT
Viewed: 
13208 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Dave Schuler wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad, Jaco van der Molen wrote:
> > > > The reason I am asking is that I cannot tell which cone is official or
> > > > unofficial. By mistake I used the new and old version in the same model file.
> > > 
> > > Maybe all unofficial parts should have "(Unofficial)" in their descriptions.
> > > That should remove any ambiguity.
> > 
> > I would suggest that the "official" elements should have "official" in their
> > descriptions, instead.  "Unofficial" elements can come from any of a zillion
> > sources impossible to oversee, but the "official" elements come from a single,
> > tightly-controlled source.
> 
> Part names have a maximum length of 64 characters.  Some rare parts run up
> against this limit.  Consequently, I don't think adding "Official" to official
> part names is a viable solution.  (To be honest, it would also by really
> annoying to see that on the end of all official part names.)  The length
> restriction could probably be safely ignored with unofficial parts.  Although
> I'm not sure this is a good solution to the problem, I can't think of something
> better off-hand.

Ah--I get it.  I was thinking that it would be sufficient to include it
somewhere in the hidden text of the file, but if we're talking about the actual
part name, then I can see how that might not work.

Dave!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Using Unofficial parts in seperate folder
 
(...) Part names have a maximum length of 64 characters. Some rare parts run up against this limit. Consequently, I don't think adding "Official" to official part names is a viable solution. (To be honest, it would also by really annoying to see (...) (18 years ago, 5-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR