 | | Re: Looking for 7740 as a .DAT file
|
|
O.k., finally found it on brickshelf... cu, adrian (17 years ago, 21-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Thats is, thanks Manfred! (17 years ago, 21-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) Actually I find it quite logically it's not supported. And I don't think it's a specific OpenGL thing. Once the vertices's are not concave, you basically stop having a Quad all to getter. It becomes a polygon, and how is the hardware supposed (...) (17 years ago, 21-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) Hi there. I'm just getting up to speed with OpenGL so it will be a little while before I can really sink my teeth into this. But, one thing I have learned so far is that the rule about non-concave quads is actually a limitation of OpenGL. It (...) (17 years ago, 21-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Or are you looking for this kind of switches: (URL) friendly greetings, Manfred. (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
(...) Do you prehaps mean part 6551.DAT - Electric Technic Pole Reverser? It is in the official parts library. With friendly greetings, Manfred. (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) OK, I read the whole post and am reposting my comments here :-) Here are my comments. I'll delineate the section where appropriate. Purpose: "standard by which most create virtual LEGO® models" Due to past personal conflicts and missteps too (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
William Howard schrieb: (...) "Write/Print" Please add a note that this is not allowed in official parts files on the PT. "File Type" In the way your wrote this artikel it is very confusing for newbees. It should be divided in two portions. Official (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
William Howard schrieb: (...) "Every line of the file contains one command. With one exception, every command is independent of other lines. The exception is the BFC INVERTNEXT command which modifies the behaviour of the immediately following (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
(...) And if we hadn't been granted an extended term (to get the voting out of summer holidays), we probably wouldn't have gotten the job done either (not that we have yet, but there's every indication that we will). I wonder if that would have (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDraw File Format Spec 1.0 DRAFT - Call for Public Comments
|
|
Like all previous LSCs, the 2006/7 LSC was charged with ratifying the LDraw File Format 1.0 specification. After much work checking, and ratifying as necessary, all linked specs and language extensions, and many months of dicussions about the actual (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad) !
|
| |
| | Looking for 9V switch as a .DAT file
|
|
Hi, does anyone has a 9V switch as a .DAT file, unfortunately can't find any on the LDRAW site, nor in official, nor in unofficial parts. Does anyone has it and may tell me the link or send it as file? Why do I am looking for that? I want to include (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Looking for 7740 as a .DAT file
|
|
Hi, maybe I am too stupid to use the search engine :-) but I can't find no 7740 as a .DAT file and I do know that (years ago) I did find them here (but lost them due to changing computers). Does anyone has it and may tell me the link or send it as (...) (17 years ago, 20-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: "Building with Bricksmith" screencast video
|
|
(...) It looks good, though, doesn't it? But you're right, if LDView 3.2 is a beta, this is, what, pre-alpha? I can change the caption. Hope you don't mind the "pre-release publicity." Jim (17 years ago, 19-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Building with Bricksmith" screencast video
|
|
I hardly think something that's not even close to feature complete (LDView Cocoa) qualifies as "Beta" ;-). --Travis (17 years ago, 19-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | "Building with Bricksmith" screencast video
|
|
I have recorded a silent video "screencast" of the creation of my most recent (URL) LDraw model> (yet another B-Wing variant). It is not a short video, but it shows the whole process from start to finish. Watching it has already given me a few ideas (...) (17 years ago, 19-Aug-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Working with large models in LDD.
|
|
Hello all, I am currently working on a mosaic using nothing but 1x1 bricks. My problem is that the its over 13000 bricks. This seems to really cause problems with the speed of LDD. I am using a Macintosh PowerBook 1.67 with a gig of ram. It was (...) (17 years ago, 16-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Selling prints of LDraw renders
|
|
(...) Ok, thanks guys. As I've looked into logistics in other areas (would people even be interested in buying prints/cards/etc. of LDraw scenes? I have a feeling it would be difficult to turn any kind of profit with this.) I'm not sure how far I'll (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Selling prints of LDraw renders
|
|
(...) Given the way the software is made available, I would hope that anyone considering turning a profit from it might consider earmarking a portion of the proceeds to Ldraw.org - like Tim Courtney did from the sales of (URL) Virtual Lego>. Cheers (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Selling prints of LDraw renders
|
|
(...) Dear Philip, To my knowledge there is nothing stopping you doing this. I wouldn't swear that it's not infringing copyright (IANAL) but I find it extremely unlikely anyone would make an issue out of it. Tim (speaking without his SteerCo hat on) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
