 | | Re: 2nd LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
Hi Steve, In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss wrote: <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> (...) Thank you for nominating me. But because of dramatic missing time, I would like to decline. I believe I was no big help the past year, and therefor (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
I had the same error on my laptop (8MB video). Launch the preferences icon in the designer folder and change the setting to low end spec (something like that). Then do the save and launch. This fixed the issue for me. Hope this helps. George (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 2nd LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) I accept. --Travis Cobbs (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-colanar quads question
|
|
(...) Be careful with that. You could also replace it with triangles (ABD and DBC) using the other diagonal. I think one way will give you a nice convex exterior and the other way will create all sorts of nasty concavities. You can do some origami (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-coplanar quads question
|
|
DOH! Who stole the P? (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Non-colanar quads question
|
|
I'm fixing the Perl code that generates the curved surface of the Half [1] Onion Dome (part 44511) from its control data. At the moment the surface comprises counter-clockwise wound quads (ABCD) [3] and conditional lines (AB, BC, CD and DA). (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2nd LSC: Call for Nominations
|
|
(...) snip (...) I Andrew Allan accept this nomination Andrew... (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
(...) My error message (after full screen mode and Getting Started popped up): DESIGNER orsakade ett ogiltigt sidfel i modul QDISPLAYDX8.DLL på adress 017f:44428acc. Registrerar: EAX=00000000 CS=017f EIP=44428acc EFLGS=00010206 EBX=00e83570 SS=0187 (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
"Marc Sutton" <ashre@iname.com> wrote in message news:I0svG8.Lw@lugnet.com... (...) and buy (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) I can't get this version of LDD to run. When I invoke LDD it takes me into a full screen mode where I see a splash screen. (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 Available
|
|
LEGO Digital Designer 1.2 has been released and you can download it from: (URL) has a new Pick-A-Brick palette so you can build with LDD and then go and buy your creation from a Pick-A-Brick location. Other new features include: * Support for German (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad) !
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I think that's a good idea, and it makes sense to me. Abstain becomes not exactly no (since it doesn't count against the measure), instead it means "I need more information" - which is a valid response, IMO. Oh, and I agree that the checkbox (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) Another thought - don't treat the 'no responses' and 'abstain' as identical. The actual abstain votes could be counted toward a total count, and the ayes would have to exceed a given fraction of that total. For example, we could require a 33% (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) Well, it's not really voting about my copyright, it's voting about retroactively accepting changes to the agreement between myself and LDraw.org. My issue is the checkbox pretty much invalidates the entire 'making changes' section of CA. If a (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I like it. :) That's almost like what I asked for before (URL) Steve (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I like that. I'll tkae that into consideration with the new draft I'm writing. -Orion (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) That kind of makes sense. I'm writing a new CA draft and I'll take that into consideration. -Orion (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I admit my turnout values may have been optimistic :) But I still feel that a greater than 50.00000something percent positive vote ought to be needed to move away from something as good as the ShareAlike license. (...) What, at the risk of (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Mac Brick CAD 3 Testers Wanted
|
|
To the Mac users, I've begun writing MBC 3 (it will be a bit more time before it is published). This is a ground-up rewrite and incorporates an entirely new rendering system. At this early stage I'm looking for a couple of additional testers with (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) Wouldn't putting something in the CA, with the whole section explaining how the license can be changed in the future, something like this: While the library's license can be changed in the future using this procedure, any new license will have (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
|
(...) I agree with the timeout, and that the authors need to maintain their email addr on record updated. I'm not sure we should discount Peter's note though, that right now we're setting up a system that by default will accept change - that is not (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
