Subject:
|
Re: Moving the License Forward
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:37:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2890 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> If I accept the "Contributor's agreement" in its current
> form, I will probably also check the "auto-approve changes
> checkbox". Voting about my copyright doesn't make sense to
> me. Either I accept the risk and leave the decision to the
> LDraw.org Steering Committee, or I keep the right to make
> the decisions myself.
Well, it's not really voting about my copyright, it's voting about retroactively
accepting changes to the agreement between myself and LDraw.org.
My issue is the checkbox pretty much invalidates the entire 'making changes'
section of CA. If a majority of authors select the checkbox, then there is
basically no requirement for voting on any changes that might be made.
There's also the issue of administering the checkbox settings -- authors need to
be able to change their option (over time), LDraw.org will need to be able to
migrate the checkbox-data to a new system (whenever we might move to a new
system).
I'd much rather have the language that Dan outlined
<http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=3248>, and remove the checkbox --
possibly even remove the entire section on change-management.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) The entire "Contributor's agreement". If I accept the "Contributor's agreement" in its current form, I will probably also check the "auto-approve changes checkbox". Voting about my copyright doesn't make sense to me. Either I accept the risk (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
