Subject:
|
Re: Moving the License Forward
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:36:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2979 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> > I haven't thought it properly through yet, but I would like
> > to have some assurance that either the basic characteristics
> > of the license will remain unchanged (for example through a
> > fixed "human readable" version of the license)
>
> That's hard to put into legalese, I fear, but I agree that's an important
> concept. I think we all agree once we have this fixed there won't be, and won't
> need to be, change at the macro level. How WOULD we go about codifying that
> idea?
Wouldn't putting something in the CA, with the whole section explaining how the
license can be changed in the future, something like this:
While the library's license can be changed in the future using this procedure,
any new license will have to conform with the following goals:
- intent #1
- intent #2
- ...
How's that?
Dan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) That's hard to put into legalese, I fear, but I agree that's an important concept. I think we all agree once we have this fixed there won't be, and won't need to be, change at the macro level. How WOULD we go about codifying that idea? (...) (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
