Subject:
|
Re: Moving the License Forward
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:21:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2955 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Dan Boger wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> > > I haven't thought it properly through yet, but I would like
> > > to have some assurance that either the basic characteristics
> > > of the license will remain unchanged (for example through a
> > > fixed "human readable" version of the license)
> >
> > That's hard to put into legalese, I fear, but I agree that's an important
> > concept. I think we all agree once we have this fixed there won't be, and won't
> > need to be, change at the macro level. How WOULD we go about codifying that
> > idea?
>
> Wouldn't putting something in the CA, with the whole section explaining how the
> license can be changed in the future, something like this:
>
> While the library's license can be changed in the future using this procedure,
> any new license will have to conform with the following goals:
>
> - intent #1
> - intent #2
> - ...
>
> How's that?
I like that. I'll tkae that into consideration with the new draft I'm writing.
-Orion
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) Wouldn't putting something in the CA, with the whole section explaining how the license can be changed in the future, something like this: While the library's license can be changed in the future using this procedure, any new license will have (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
