 | | Re: June-Fourth Inccident Memorial
|
|
(...) Hi David! The links don't seem to work for me; I'm getting the error message "The page cannot be found." Could you double-check them? Dave! (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | June-Fourth Inccident Memorial
|
|
I have made 3 pic: No Text: (URL) Text: (URL) give comments and wt do u think (I am doing nothing about political) -David Chiu (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) This is a tough one Dan. Before becoming a member on the SteerCo, I never gave licensing much thought, but I'm getting up to speed now. There are a number of issues about licensing as wel can tell by the many conversations from the past and (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: the train is growing
|
|
(...) Hi Trevor, what kind of machine do you use for those images? I'm just working on an image where the pov-code has 39.000 lines. And I just found out that not the povcode but the resolution and render-options can be the problem. The actual (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) I'm extremely adverse to a future SteerCo having the ability to change the terms of the EndUser license at will, especially after we're putting all this effort into getting it correct now. For an example, could the SteerCo give some examples (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | 3D Constructapedia
|
|
I am not sure if has been mentioned here recently but Tufts have a new 3D Constructapedia they are developing at (URL) you might be interested. Bernard (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw/POV-Ray Display at Garfield Heights HomeDays
|
|
Mike, Here's some renders I've done that you can use. (URL) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.events, lugnet.cad, lugnet.loc.us.oh)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Sorry, I was a bit too terse here. This refers to how we start. Do we have a way to migrate all the parts in, or do we have to get explicit recertification from each author of each and every part (many parts currently in the library hvae (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New Subpart: 30176s01.dat - Bamboo Leaf (Mockup) [DAT]
|
|
0 Bamboo Leaf (Mockup) 0 Name: 30176s01.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Subpart 0 BFC NOCERTIFY 1 16 10 0 0 0 1 -0.05 1 0 0 0 0 1 2-4edge.dat 1 16 10 0 0 0 1 -0.05 1 0 0 0 0 -1 2-4edge.dat 1 16 9.95 0 0 0 9.05 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 30176.dat - Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves [DAT]
|
|
0 Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves 0 Name: 30176.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3062b.dat 1 16 0 8 0 0.643 0 0.766 0 1 0 -0.766 0 0.643 30176s01.dat 1 16 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Sorry, I missed typed. I meant to say "If possible, I'd like to see a method by which we can revise the licence but not have to get explicit agreement from every author." I with Tim's above statments. -Orion (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) I think I disagree here. One of the problems we have right now is when we implement the license, we will have to explicitly seek each author's approval. Some authors will be unreachable, which means we won't be able to gain their perimssion to (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Yes. If possible, I'd like to see a method by which we can revise the licence but have to get explicit agreement from every author. (...) I want the ability to evolve the library. What I'm worried about is an author pulling their part out of (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) Just for you, I bought a 7081 set today, and I'll give the plant a try. /Tore (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
(...) Wasn't there a question if an author agrees to distribute the part under a specific license? As in, if you change the license, do you need to get permission from the authors, etc? (...) Are we still allowing us to rename parts? What about (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Plant Brick 1 x 1 Round with 3 Bamboo Leaves
|
|
(...) I found out that according this site (URL) partnumber must be 30176. Would this be correct? And, can someone make it? Thanks. Jaco (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: the train is growing
|
|
Wow! Nice render! Sometimes I like rendering really massive pictures just for the fun of it. Good idea for the Santa Fe! And 20,000 lines... I've got files in excess of 100,000 lines on my PC. Anyways, good job. (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Problem with click hinge part(s)?
|
|
I'm working on modeling a recent creation in MLcad, and noticed that there is a difference in the height of the .dat versions of these parts: (2 URLs) When they are lined up side-by-side, the click hinge portions do not line up. This picture is (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: License Intent
|
|
FTX and me are not getting along tonite. In the interests of not having words disappear I am posting this in plain text. Apologies for the dups and cancels. In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote: In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
