| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> * Parts migration... require explicit recertification? (implementation?)
Sorry, I was a bit too terse here. This refers to how we start. Do we have a way
to migrate all the parts in, or do we have to get explicit recertification from
each author of each and every part (many parts currently in the library hvae
multiple authors)
Rosco suggested a transitional "old" and "new" library/distribution in which we
DO get explicit recertification and the non certified parts are distributed the
old way without an explicit license.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) I'm not philosophically opposed to an old/new library, but it would be awkward to administer. Especially if we suddenly started restricting ourselves from modifying the uncertified files. We'd start spending a lot of time explaining to people (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: License Intent
|
| FTX and me are not getting along tonite. In the interests of not having words disappear I am posting this in plain text. Apologies for the dups and cancels. In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote: In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
139 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
