 | | Re: Ben's BR24 instructions
|
|
(...) Hello Tim, I feel sorry for being too fast.... ;-) In fact that has been my third instruction I did with LPub and I fear it might be the last one for quite a while. It is simply too time cosuming to do such an instruction and additionally I am (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Lsynth thoughts.
|
|
(...) Please do. I got to tinkering over the weekend and added some code to generate the fixed length 50 segment 751.DAT style rubber hoses. (URL) also tinkered with simulating 208c01.DAT fixed length chain links as a hose. I think it might work (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Steering Committee Recommendations (was: Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org ...)
|
|
(...) I agree - while I have a preference for open-sourced programs, it's the licensing of the library that I'm more concerned about. ... (...) I'm surprised (no, actually amazed) that you do not have Steve Bliss on that list. To paraphrase Larry, (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) The LDraw Standards Committee, or LSC, is a special committee, recognised by the bylaws as a special sort of SIG with special processes, that is in charge of developing, codifying, and fostering the growth of the file, naming, coding and other (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Here's the clarification: The LDraw.org Steering Committee (StC) is the controlling group for LDraw as an organization. The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) is charged with maintaining and expanding the LDraw file format. - Orion (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Yes. Unfortunately, the acronym can cause confusion. We should fix that by clearly defining acronyms for each. There is the LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) - elected last July and charged with adopting standards and publishing spec (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Um, I feel a bit foolish, but since Andrew brought it up I guess I should ask. Are there really two different LSCs, a Steering Committee and a Standards Committee? If so, what's the difference? I must've missed that somewhere. Thanks, Don (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
Ha, my post certainly stirred up some folks out there! I just want to let you know that allthough I'm not a mac user I simply prefer Leocad above (for example) MLCad because I think it's simply more intuitive and works a lot faster. I know that (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Steering Committee Recommendations (was: Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org ...)
|
|
Hi Dan - Thanks for posting your thoughts. Please see mine interspersed. (...) I (...) these (...) a (...) to (...) organization, (...) Good summation. I agree, it is important people realize the trust they are putting into these elected (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) That would be a good thing for the life of this nice editor! Philo (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) No. It started out as a viewer, but I added an LEDIT compatible editor mode a long time ago. (...) You can do it that way by putting ldglite in polling mode. In fact that's what I initially thought would work best for me. But the poll and (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) But isn't Ldglite just a viewer, compared to the editor Leocad? That said, it seems to have the advantage of actually working, so maybe Emacs + Ldglite would be a viable way to edit Ldraw files. Last time I tried Leocad it crashed after a (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Advise on Flex tubing and Pneumatic hoses
|
|
I have been making the custom length flex tubing (using 75.dat and 76.dat) for a while, I normally crate the length I want save it for future use as, for exampl 75_12.dat and import it into my model as a subpart to allow for use of the .mpd on other (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) didn't (...) I don't disagree with the names you suggested, what I don't really understand is why it would be a Good Thing for a candidate not to inform about his/her intentions (or lack thereof)? -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) Oops, sorry Don ;o) (I am not a Linux user...) Philo (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations to LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
As we get nearer to the election, I wanted to post my thoughts on what I think the steering committee should look like. We're electing the SC to lead the LDraw organization. To codify it, define what it really is, and how it works. In the past we (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) Ouch! That stings. While it may not be as pretty as LeoCAD (or well documented) ldglite does work on linux. Here's a snapshot of ldglite creating a hose on an old mandrake system. (URL) thanks for the LeoCAD update. It's nice to have choices. (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2004-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) sounds intriguing. do you still have a copy on your disk? may I have a look (for educational purposes ;-)? w. (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org 2004-02 Parts Update Now Available
|
|
(...) my two helmets where part of update 2004-01, but it came with no "~movedto" reference in the outdated 193.dat. this ref was included in 2004-02. my guess is that you are missing update 2004-01 or that something went wrong with the 2004-02 (...) (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial LeoCAD parts update #17
|
|
(...) ;o)) (...) Maybe... (I should say "for sure"). There should be at least all CAD users who work under Linux, AFAIK LeoCAD is the only one there! Philo (20 years ago, 26-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
