 | | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) I think ldview and ldglite can do this. (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Cool! I actually like the plugin idea even better than open source (although the two ideas do work together well). In my LDRAW fantasy world (which is probably based on Karim's Artemis paper) all the really nifty functionality is provided by (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) Now that would be the zoom, wouldn't it? What I actually meant was a) a zoom that can get "inside" a model (useful for buildings specially) and b) a way to move and rotate the camera's target point. (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) That is my experience. Nobody has said anything about the source code I have posted. And not all of it was my yucky code, but some awesome OpenGL code written by an OpenGL wiz. And I have tried to read both ldglite, MBC, and LDView source (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Don't forget LDDP's generator (soon to be a plugin again). It's based on Fredrik Glockner's emacs code and supports: 73590B.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L with Tabs (750.dat for endpoints) 73590A.DAT Hose Flexible 8.5L without Tabs (752.dat for (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw based editor... GLIDE.
|
|
(...) My pleasure (...) 3DS stands for 3D Studio, or 3DS Max, as it now is called. This was originally an Autodesk product, now offered by Discreet. (URL) what I was referring to is the file format, which has become one of the standard ways to share (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) I expect people to ask me. (...) LSynth is an all in one synthesizer in that it does hose and band type synthesis, and it is stand alone, and the synthesis process does not involve manual copying of stuff (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) Yes, with a wider audience or a desperate need, it's much more likely someone will be brave enough to jump in and contribute. It also helps if the project seems active. I tried to generate some activity by making a portable version of the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) How about not. s\3626bs00.dat exists for a specific purpose, and I don't think this is a good reason to hijack the file. Steve (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) I would definitely like to do this, because the resulting heads look much better, IMO. (see (URL) Through the magic of perl, I've already modified many of the heads on my computer. (...) Hopefully it's the ball joint that's sized wrong, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) I count about 49 heads. That's based on an out-of-date directory on my hard drive, there may be a few more by now. That's a lot of parts to update all in one go. We've done it before, or at least nearly; we redesigned the neck-mark on minifig (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
I'll be the first to appologize for not having jumped in on this yet : ( It's on my list of things that I want to make time for though : ) The problem here isn't the OSS paradigm, it's the relatively small audience. It can only grow though ... (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin [DAT]
|
|
While I was reviewing this part; "Minifig Head with Standard Grin Pattern" (URL) came across this note; "The (sub)part is still missing most of the horizontal conditional edges. Could torus primitives be used?" My answer would be, "sure why not..." (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I gave away the source to LSynth and publicly asked for help, given that it really has never made it past the proof of concept stage. No one has taken me up on it, so going open source, does not neccessadily get you anywhere. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I'm trained and skilled in programming, but I learned the Borland C++ builder environment as I went. I have yet to figure out how to split my files into subsystems. I tried it and had trouble getting it to work for LPub. As it stands, LPub is (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
Bill As has been pointed out, many of the programs (including mine) have freely available source code. Several people have suggested I post my application on SourceForge and develop from there, this has merits and is used by Don with LdGLite, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
|
|
(...) I have always liked CMDLINE followed by a default colour, and I have the feeling that I am one of those who have used it most times. I also think it really is a pity that it hasn't been used by any [online] catalog or other partlisters (that I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I understand the feeling. For me, when I open up my work (I don't code, but I do write, papers, a book, proposals, etc) to others, I expect and welcome criticism, so long as it is framed constructively. If I were to venture a guess, you aren't (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) That is closest. (...) I am not familiar to the exact meaning of open source, but I guess it can be a little like when you submit the dat code for a part to the PT. Suddenly you find that it has been changed or even renamed. In almost all (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
|
(...) I was speaking abstractly. (...) Yes, I agree. And it was good that you brought the topic up - I'm glad it will get developers thinking about open source. -Tim (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
