To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 11322
11321  |  11323
Subject: 
Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:39:08 GMT
Viewed: 
1121 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
   In lugnet.cad, William R. Ward wrote:
   The LDRAW tools (including MLCAD) are available for free download in binary form. But the source code is kept private. I’d like to offer a word of encouragement to the authors and maintainers of the code to consider opening the source code. This would allow other users who have the programming skills to submit patches to fix bugs and add features.

For more information about Open Source please see the Open Source Initiative Web site. They explain it a lot better than I can.

Imagine setting up a SourceForge instance or at least a CVS server on ldraw.org and accepting patches from all and sundry. The author/maintainer would maintain control over the project, while allowing the LDRAW tools to be a community-supported system instead of having to do all the work themselves.

Think about it ...

I gave away the source to LSynth and publicly asked for help, given that it really has never made it past the proof of concept stage. No one has taken me up on it, so going open source, does not neccessadily get you anywhere.

  
--Bill.

Kevin

That is my experience. Nobody has said anything about the source code I have posted. And not all of it was my yucky code, but some awesome OpenGL code written by an OpenGL wiz.

And I have tried to read both ldglite, MBC, and LDView source code. It is all over my head anyway. So I totally understand why nobody gives feedback. Those who do know how to read complex code aren’t really interested in reading it because they would rather code it from scratch using techniques they are familar with.

What I would like to see, is instead of open source, I would just LOVE to see a unified developer effort to create an LDraw library, like opengl, openal, libpng, libsdl, openssl, openldap, etc, etc, etc.

Yeah, we all have our editor preferences. But what about utilites? Does anyone really cares how a fractal landscape generator works? Or file format converters? I would like to see these made open source and try to make them as cross platform as possible (since I can’t use any utilities currently out there on my Mac except L3P). This is what could be in the libraries.

James



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
 
(...) I have the beginnings of this with the DATBase, DATModel, and L3Check units used for LDDP. I've been considering splintering these units off into their own project. The only thing hindering me is the (apparent) lack of Delphi programmers in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
 
(...) I gave away the source to LSynth and publicly asked for help, given that it really has never made it past the proof of concept stage. No one has taken me up on it, so going open source, does not neccessadily get you anywhere. (...) Kevin (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)

48 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR