Subject:
|
Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:57:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1979 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
>
> > I don't think the above looks like stuff that goes into an LDraw file format,
> > unless we introduce a whole bunch of meta commands. When it is this far off, is
> > it worth forcing it into the LDraw file format? I suppose the advantage is that
> > people can define their hose type directly in an LDraw file and have it ported
> > around with it. Hmmm...
>
> Actually, I'd very much like to figure what definition information can be put in part
> files, and how model files could then specify the specific way the part is deformed.
>
> Steve
OK Steve, I'll work up a proposal.
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why aren't LDRAW tools Open Source?
|
| (...) Actually, I'd very much like to figure what definition information can be put in part files, and how model files could then specify the specific way the part is deformed. Steve (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
