 | | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I object, for the record. I think the point isn't if someone can influence TLC policy, but if they can influence LDraw's policy. In my optinion, if you get a paycheck from LEGO, you might have a conflict of interest. (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New MINI Moc: The Shadow
|
|
The Shadow. My strange looking new MINI can be found here: (URL) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) My second reply to this post - this time I'm addressing the issue from a personal perspective, rather than the less partial process-oriented viewpoint in my previous post. I am concerned that a blanket provision to ban TLC employees will (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) [...] (...) Fair enough. (...) My position is this - there are certian levels of employment in an organization that don't allow influence over company policy, and those levels of employees should not be excluded from eligibility to be elected (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) it’s not the point if Tim has/has not a conflict of interest or is/is not eligible to be a Steering Committee Officer. I posted the comment just to show that the membership of LEGO employees in fan clubs is an issue and it has to be solved (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
|
(...) With too little sleep, I'm not sure what I'm saying either... :) Let me see... I have 9 copies of 33cc01 and no copy of 32c[c01] I have lots of 32bc01 and 33bc01, I won't even count them. Then I have two or more copies of 33ac01 but no 32ac01 (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I wouldn't expect that to conflict with any responsibilities you might get on the LDraw.org board. (...) Agreed. But it seemed - from Willy's message - like we might run into trouble with the views of a majority of the European LEGO fans using (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I'm a sales associate at a Brand Retail store, part-time. (...) I don't see a conflict with my current job description. Like Larry, I say let it be a campaign issue. That seems to me the simplest solution. -Tim (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what you are saying here. 32.dat is the left (hinged) door with the knob on the right. Do you mean you have 9 copies of (URL) all with no hole? If true, it is certainly strange that all of my type 32 parts do have a hole and all (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) That (both the itlug and Dan's solutions) is definitely a nice and easy solution. The problem here is that Tim would like to keep his job at LEGO and have a go at being on the LDraw.org steering committee. Since I don't know what Tim's (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Bylaws Draft v.2
|
|
This is a re-post of the bylaws draft, omitting paragraph 3 of Section 6.02, per the discussion here: (URL). This copy of the draft supercedes the draft this message is in reply to. If there are any modifications to the draft before it goes to a (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
|
(...) stud, no hole. All of them right. It seems too many to be coincidential... /Tore (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows - Forget About 604a
|
|
There's no way this door was made in the CA era. Instead of "unknown", is there someway we could mark the "confirmed to never have existed" state? Just looking for a better way to put it... /Tore (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Problem with color scaling option in LPub
|
|
Hello, I’m having a little rendering problem and I’m not quite sure what is causing it. I’m using LPub to do my BI’s, so, naturally, I use the color scaling option. However, the main construction images in mpd files render without the color scaling (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: Variants of 646*.dat
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) The images for the proposed 646 (1x2x6 with Shutters) varients are now on the reference page. (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | BSCP "Bississippi"
|
|
(2 URLs) The (URL) Basic Shape-Changing Platform> (BSCP - "Bississippi") is a simplified version of the (URL) Shape-Shifting Camera Tank (SSCT)> that I created for the "Mindstorms Masterpieces" Book. Despite clocking at less than 150 pieces (not (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.cad, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: Variants of 646*.dat
|
|
(...) Thanks - I had forgotten about Gary Istok's dissertations on the subject of Classic Windows. Regarding 646 (1x6x2 with Shutters)<QUOTE> Here is what I have (with counts in parethesis): Full Stud windows with sills (and 2 small holes on top): (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: Variants of 646*.dat
|
|
(...) Oh dear, oh dear! Just as I thought I was getting to understand something, everything turns out to be much more complicated. It really saddens me to see that appearantly it wasn't just Samsonite that sold windows without glasses. Pop went my (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3035p01.dat - confirmation, it exists!
|
|
(...) Thanks Clark! Too bad that geocities.jp link is dead. That would have been so much easier to tell if the part had been red... Well, I think it is ABS. No sign of misforming, I'd say the stud logo is late 60's, higher and more modern than the (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(...) I agree. If I would reduce the decimal points the size would be reduced by 20k but then I get a lot of not coplanar vertices so that these needs to be split (increeses size) or have to store with the numbers. But the neighbour vertices needed (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
