Subject:
|
Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:10:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2082 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/chris.w.dee/LDrawClassicWindows/
> >
> > Hmm, this doesn't look good. I have 6 red, 2 white, and 1 yellow door w open
> > stud, no hole. All of them right. It seems too many to be coincidential...
> >
> >
> > /Tore
>
> I'm not sure what you are saying here. 32.dat is the left (hinged) door with the
> knob on the right.
With too little sleep, I'm not sure what I'm saying either... :)
Let me see...
I have 9 copies of 33cc01 and no copy of 32c[c01]
I have lots of 32bc01 and 33bc01, I won't even count them.
Then I have two or more copies of 33ac01 but no 32ac01
> The discussion is probably acamdemic, since the presence or absence of the small
> hole alone is non-functional, and seems to be correlated with the long ledge (on
> parts that have a ledge). So for 32 and 33 I propose only to release two
> versions :
> ..a : Solid stud, hole
> ..b : Hollow stud, hole (since we know this exists on 32 and 33) OR
> ..c : Hollow stud, no hole (if we can prove 32 without hole)
> Does this make sense?
Yes, I think so. And as I said in the subject line: 32c is not yet confirmed.
Sorry for being unclear.
/Tore
>
> Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
| (...) I'm not sure what you are saying here. 32.dat is the left (hinged) door with the knob on the right. Do you mean you have 9 copies of (URL) all with no hole? If true, it is certainly strange that all of my type 32 parts do have a hole and all (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
