 | | Classic Windows: Variants of 646*.dat
|
|
(...) I have 3 variants of 646*.dat I think: 646ac01 solid stud, holes, long ledge, glass about 66 ldu wide 646bc01 hollow stud, holes, long ledge, glass about 66 ldu wide 646cc01 hollow stud, no holes, long ledge, glass 112 ldu wide 646a/b: Holes (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | More than 100 of my models
|
|
The zipped file contains more than 100 of my lego models. Most of them use only official parts. Don't miss the "Dune" directory if you are a Dune-games fan or a classic space fan. (URL) the link does not work then go to the main page and click (...) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(snip) I think you're both right. I am reminded of a quote: "Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler." -Albert Einstein You're both geniuses too, you know. :-) (21 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: No more parts updates?
|
|
Ahhhh, Leonardo good to hear from you ! Bad to hear that you lost your program tools, That kind of thing happens at least once to all of us I guess ;-). Well, I do have problems with the piece library manager. Sometimes the program simple freezes up (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.leocad)
|
| |
| | File Size Concerns ( Was Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW))
|
|
(...) I agree with the elimination of excess but I disagree with a reduction in part quality simply because it is "too large" (...) I agree again. The point I was trying to make is size concerns should not be the only reason to redo a quality[1] (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) I agree with Thomas (and Orion, I think - although from his post, I'm not sure he looked at your reduced-size file) -- keep the original. If you are concerned about file size, you could try reducing the number of decimal places on your (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) I have to strongly disagree with this. If a file can be done just as well with fewer bytes, that's a good thing. Good for downloading, good for maintaining the part, good for storing the parts library. (...) I won't argue with your figures, I (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Multicolor identical lines in a datfile?
|
|
(...) It wouldn't hurt to put the component parts in different ~part files. Otherwise, if you leave it all as one file, I wouldn't put both of the edges in. Steve (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Classic Windows Type c: Short Ledge
|
|
My theory is that Samsonite (and maybe some more non-Danish plants?) made the without holes version of the classic windows. Also, Samsonite launced their version of 29c, 29c, and 27c without glass. Plesae correct me if O'm mistaken. I have a bunch (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Classic Windows Type a: Solid Studs
|
|
(Let's keep this thread for inventories and discussion on solid studded classic doors and windows) Inventory from my collection: 27a solid stud, long ledge, hole, no glass(1): confirmed! 7026a solid studs, long ledge, hole, no glass(1): confirmed! (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows
|
|
(...) Thanks for your response. (...) Thanks, these are already confirmed from my collection. So far the reference page contains only those sizes up to 1x4x2 - the larger ones already exist in the official library (see below) and although in need of (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows
|
|
(...) to (...) versions (...) if you (...) I was looking on the quick reference page and there are three windows type missing from that list. Maybe you have them on another list? I have 4 pieces of 453cc01 (red), and one piece of 453bc01 (red), 2 (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) part-time, student, non-career, professional, careerist ,steering committee, fellow member, active member ... there is a german saying: den wald vor lauter bäumen nicht sehen (not spotting the forest because of too many trees ;-) I remember (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) You are right, that is no longer a problem. And the CPU(s) on any machine should render a 200k file as fast as a 10k file. The only aspect could be the up- and download time. But for a "perfect" part we shouldn't waste a thought on this. CU (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) If it's not broke why fix it? I think the one on the PT is just fine. The file size concern have gotten entirly out of hand. Let's do some math: Peeron has 3628 out of 5589 (64%) sets invertoried for a total of 8062 parts (this includes Moved (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows
|
|
(...) I have generated the DAT files for all the single pane classic windows up to 1x4x2. Now I could really do with some assistance to clarify which versions really exist. I have generated a quick reference page at (URL) reply to this message with (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal Tail Section end (NEW)
|
|
(...) The one on the Tracker is far better. Saving 30% on file size is not worth it for the great degradation in quality. TWS Garrison (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Animal Tail Section end (NEW) [DAT]
|
|
I tried to reduce the filesize of the x378.dat actual on the tracker is this 98 kB file: (URL) is the new 69.5 kB file. Please tell me which one the better file is. 0 Animal Tail Section End 0 Name: x378a.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Part (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
(...) I can go with this solution also. Headed off to work for now, but I'll be back with this thread sometime this weekend to re-post the drafts. Ratification will take place once technical concerns have been addressed. -Tim (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Access to a wide-format printer?
|
|
Oh...I've just seen the condition...only within North America. Sorry :o( "Tim Courtney" <tim.courtney@SPAMCA...ktron.com> wrote in message news:HsAEy6.p4E@lugnet.com... (...) tray), and (...) PDX. I (...) The (...) own (...) printer (...) for (...) (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.publish, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
