 | | Re: Generator, Primitives, and Part questions
|
|
(...) The above URL is correct but I went back and reread your post and all of the primitives you listed are already official, they were released with the last parts update. Did you download the last update? If not, here's the URL to the 2003-2 (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) This is basically a neat recolor of existing stock sets, ne? recolors are neat and this is a fairly sharp fantasy scheme (I can't see using white doors in real life though), yes, but I guess I like MOCs better. The MOC engine (are the two (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) yup, you're not alone. I've posted a few trains here, not a single response. Luckily, I ran them at shows, and got alot of oohs and ahhs. for instance: (URL) 1 response. (URL) response from Joe who has seen them live before. These were not a (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Generator, Primitives, and Part questions
|
|
(...) I think partsref uses a perl script, but you may need a UNIX OS of some sort to run it on. :) You might be able to rig up a batch file to do it with ldlite or the ldglite offscreen renderer on Windows. Something like this: FOR %%F IN (*.dat) (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
/snip/ (...) Thanks for the suggestion, I will have to try that out for the rounded wedge pieces. As for my rant before, I am chalking that up to over reacting after a few rough days of life... Thanks for the encouragement. (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Generator, Primitives, and Part questions
|
|
(...) Where again please (URL)? I am going to this page: (URL) and you cannot find these files there. Of course, I cannot see why these files are not there. Also, the currently downloadable zipfile of the unofficial parts is missing many, many of (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) Another quick suggestion: Run you the POV file the L3P generate through the program found here: (URL) does a fairly good job of smoothing the parts that should be curved -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Generator, Primitives, and Part questions
|
|
(...) These are on the LDraw.org Parts Tracker (PT). In general, it's ok to use these just be aware that they may change. Typically the only change these undergo is a winding swap. (...) I checked the PT and it looks like this hasn't been made yet. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Generator, Primitives, and Part questions
|
|
Hey Y'all: 1. Is there a render generator that will automatically generate renders of all the parts in a directory in a specific color at a specific angle? I seem to remember someone posting about this before; and it would seem that such a tool must (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) I've had train pictures posted for me before.By another AFOL. And did not seem to get much of a responce. But , I then noticed that the veiw number,on my train picture had gone up & up. You have about 1300 veiws , so you're not been ignored. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Work in progress - station scene
|
|
I've put some images of my CAD work in progress, typical British urban/suburban (URL) station set in a cutting> on Brickshelf This intended to be a setting for rolling stock similar to (URL) Ben's bridge> but with the added advantage of the enclosed (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.loc.uk, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud5 and type 5 lines at edge of cylinders.
|
|
(...) That's what I was afraid of... That is not how I handled it in the program. So, now this should apply for any segment files, right? 1-16,1-8,3-16,1-4,7-48, etc? If so, I will have to rethink how to calculate those points. now... this brings us (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud5 and type 5 lines at edge of cylinders.
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts...rimitives, Paul Easter wrote: ... "mess" ... deleted :-) (...) have handled this incorrecly, I need to know so I can try to fix the (...) this page; (...) point hanging out in space should be tangent to the cylinder, that (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) Dude don't be disheartened. It has been kinda quite around here since the DDoS attack on Lugnet. But I have to say that I liked your model and would definately like to see more. If you post was intended to elicit response from others then it (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Stud5 and type 5 lines at edge of cylinders.
|
|
(...) Ok... I'm a bit lost is all this mess. I need to know where we stand on this issue. I have a Primitive Generator program written with Visual Basic available for people to download and use. If I have handled this incorrecly, I need to know so I (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing JetRed
|
|
(...) You know, I am really starting to see a trend here. Since I never seem to get any responses, I think this will be my last post. I guess I would rather be ignored than spammed and feathered at least... (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 1 October 2003
|
|
Section Totals 048 certified files. 284 files need admin review. 436 files need more votes. 563 have uncertified subfiles. 161 held files. Total Files: 1,492 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-10-01 - 048 / 284 / 436 / 563 / 161 (1,492) 2003-09-26 - (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Postscript output
|
|
(...) I'll second that. Moreover, the EPS and PDF output (in addition to 'plain' PostScript) apparently supported by gl2ps would also be very nice. --Tom (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) If we require (by informal convention at least) authors to have the part they author, I do think there's merit in requiring at least one (or two) reviewer(s) to have the part they author as well. So I think this is a good restriction although (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Legacy Files on the Parts Tracker
|
|
(...) I agree that the way subfiles are handled is a bit klunky, but I can't think of a better way to handle them. (...) Yes, I think that we should shift away from holding unused primitives. A simple novote would suffice or maybe a "Certified but (...) (21 years ago, 1-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
