 | | Re: CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
(...) Yes, the history of the CAD industry (like the CG industry) reads like the first verses of Genesis.. "And ____ begat ____" It's hard to figure out which software belongs to which company (or which software is using which modelling engine) (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: My first rendering of a CAD-model.....
|
|
(...) after lots of positive feedback (via mail, at 1000steine and Lugnet) concerning my first atempt of a rendering, I have continued and now finished a whole train with 6 different waggons. When moderated all waggons will apear here as single (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac Brick CAD (MBC)
|
|
(...) Brian, Download the Linux parts from (URL) is called "Linux" parts, but what it is really just non-Windows parts. Your project sounds very cool. Yes, please post questions here. Also, the Mac side of LDraw is going through something of a (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac Brick CAD (MBC)
|
|
(...) OK, questions from a *rank* novice at this stuff - ie, somebody who shouldn't even remotely be involved in an alpha release, but... Why do many of the parts of the models not show up (for instance, I have many bushings hanging in mid-space (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Sopwith Camel with Pilot
|
|
Hi all, Did anyone ever noticed the Jack Stone pilot from set (URL) and (URL) does fit nicely in the Sopwith Camel (set (URL) for pictures (URL) the pictures a bit fuzzy because my camera does not autofocus on short distance... :-( Deep link: (URL) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Symmetries other than 16 and 48?
|
|
What is the general way of handling parts/primitives that have rotational symmetries other than 16 and 48? I am currently looking at reworking 73071 (the old Technic Differential), which has a rotational symmetry of 28, and 3649 (Technic Gear 40 (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
Thanks Don and Paul. I think that pretty much answers my questions for now (but no doubt I will have more later). Now to go fix some of my primitives and parts... --Lance-- (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
(...) I wonder what TLC uses as its master file format for parts... Is LXF the master format or only an output format after the part is fully designed and tested. If a change is made, do they go back to the LXF file or to the 3D application (e.g. (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: the LCD guys strike again :-)
|
|
Hi: I'm VERY confused, but have you tried LeoCAM? OK, the last alpha release only had stud-studInlet pairs, but the way it works and our ACTUAL implementation is quite close to what you describe at that webpage. Actually, our .lci files are (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | WWDC 2003!
|
|
Anyone going to WWDC 2003? I just found out I am going! Yippe! James (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway? [DAT]
|
|
(...) I'll drop a few quick secrets on how I use conditional lines. First off, I use LDAO and L3lab for the largest amount of part modeling. Usually check occasionally with LDview and Ldraw. So if you are using MLCad, and do not have LDAO, I would (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
(...) The Robert McNeel and Associates also claim that TLC uses their product Rhino ( (URL) ), thought thay don't specify how TLC uses it. I would speculate it is for part design since Rhino is cheap and powerful (Heck, I use it for part design). (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
OK more info and guesses. They, EDS, have a page where Jaguar used the same software to design the new hood ornaments. (URL) they were all done, they converted the surface representations into polys and exported them from Imageware as an .stl file. (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
Neat stuff. I was curious if one could infer what TLC's internal data formats might be with this info from the Dekstop Engineering article. The link to Unigraphics gets redirected to EDS. It seems they were acquired since the article was written. (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviewing redirected parts
|
|
(...) Good idea, Paul. I'll add that to the 'moved file' template. Thanks for the suggestion. Steve (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Peghole BFC?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about using stud4 on the bottom of Brick 1x1 Round - it would somewhat odd when rendered in 'stud as line' mode; the bottom portion of the brick would be missing. (...) Your expectation is correct. The 'inside' surface of (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Q: Parts directory?
|
|
(...) You can create an \s directory under ldraw\models, and store your subpart files there. Any LDraw-compatible program should be able to find them there. HTH, Steve (21 years ago, 22-May-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
(...) Yes. They're needed to render transparent parts correctly. (URL) they're useful for the curve smoothing algorithm in LDview and perhaps other programs. (...) It's often easiest to place the 3rd and 4th points on the corner of an adjacent (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How exactly DO I code optional lines, anyway?
|
|
In reading past posts, it seems that putting in optional lines is encouraged, but I have not been able to find any information on the proper way of using them. First, clearly I use them on outside curves, but I was not able to determine definitively (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | CAD/CAM/CGI magazine articles
|
|
Hello all, I was speaking with Tim Courtney about SIGGRAPH and mentioned a couple of magazine articles I had that I thought AFOL should be aware of. Please disregard this if it's already been posted (I tried a search with no luck, so here goes!) In (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
