 | | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Hi Steve, A question for the top & bottom part: Must the top & bottom part be 100 percent accurate? I mean the sides that aren't visible when using it as an assembled piece? I have alreddy 2 parts, but they need some more work if they need to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW crash [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Jacob, I Think you are 100 percent right. First of all, it wasn't LDRAW that crashed, but it was LEDIT. Sorry abouth that :-( I guess i found the problem causing LEDIT to crach. Perhaps this is alreddy known by other people, but it seems to (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) A: I like it. -Chuck (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New "dark red" in MLCAD/POV-Ray?
|
|
Steve, That renders out in POV-Ray more like the "Sand Red" color to me (and appears more so in MLCad, too). James Wilson (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) Great, I was mostly just testing the grounds. I wouldn't actually vote for a solution like this. (...) While this idea would unify many elements, I don't think it's a good one. After all, the technic bricks with holes or axleholes (or pins!) (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
I think the parts that go in the Round category should be more for just locating things that you would first think of as round, such as dishes and cones. For example, pieces like these (...) I would not first think of as round. Regarding your list, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
I've put together a list of possible candidates for the new Round category, and how I think they should sort out. I've included three groups of parts: 'Put in Round', 'Not Sure' and 'Probably Not', to match how I feel about them. I excluded parts I (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite colour bug
|
|
(...) The third machine with the monitor is immaterial. The opengl driver runs on the machine where the ldglite executable is running. Based on your use of a remote display, I'm going to assume you're probably running linux (and most likely a Mesa (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) I agree with that. (...) After thorough research (I googled 'liftarm', and found mostly legofan sites), I've come to the conclusion that 'liftarm' was made up by somebody, and is only used to describe Lego elements. I'm guessing that either (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: x191 & x192 part in the Parts tracker
|
|
(...) But you'll need two parts -- one for the top of the connector, and one for the bottom. And a third for the two put together... Steve (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
(...) IMPORTANT NOTE! If you install ldraw027.exe over top of your current ldraw installation, you will end up with some parts being replaced with *older* versions. To avoid this, save and run ldraw027.exe somewhere *other* than C:\.[1] Then copy (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
I just re-checked with a freshly downloaded 0.73 version. It worked fine (except part preview as said previously) on a Celeron 633, 192Mb Ram, Matrox G200 and Windows XP Professional "version 2002" US. How does it behave on your computer ? Philo (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) My personal opinion is that the liftarm category in LDraw is way too wide. I'm not quite sure myself what a "liftarm" actually is in the English language. But my understanding from LEGO is that a liftarm is a rod or a beam with a cross axle (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite colour bug
|
|
(...) What do you mean by "using the Mesa driver"? In both cases the example was rendered directly on the monitor of a third (Intel based) machine over the network. Jacob (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
|
(...) C! But it does not seem completely unacceptable to me. Play well, Jacob (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Parts Category for round parts
|
|
(...) I agree. Let's hope we can agree on a priority! (...) I thought both these would fit OK into the "liftarm" category, as that's how they'd generally be used. ROSCO (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: alignment newbie question
|
|
(...) I had this problem with my first render, too. Turned out although the alignment looked OK in MLcad, it wasn't. I needed to view it at 200% or 300% zoom and make sure everything was lined up properly. Hope this helps. ROSCO (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
(...) Could you tell me what settings you are using? I have version 73 but can't get it to run. (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
(...) Nitpick, the file is 1121 KB, not 987. --Bram (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw and Ledit in windows xp?
|
|
"Mark Kennedy" <mkennedy@peak.org> wrote in message news:GpEA3p.3tt@lugnet.com... (...) Whoops... www.ldraw.org/downlo.../win/step1 -Tim (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
