Subject:
|
Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:05:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
411 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> Since there hasn't been discussion of this topic, and more than two weeks
> have elapsed, can we assume that:
>
> A) The proposed revision is acceptable
> B) The proposed revision is un-acceptable
> C) No one knows
C!
But it does not seem completely unacceptable to me.
Play well,
Jacob
--
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Biler/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| Since there hasn't been discussion of this topic, and more than two weeks have elapsed, can we assume that: A) The proposed revision is acceptable B) The proposed revision is un-acceptable C) No one knows LMKWYT, Steve (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
