Subject:
|
Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Dec 2001 03:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse writes:
> Just a thought. If the POVRAY (or whatever) sections get too big,
> would it make sense to add 0 INCLUDE meta-command so the LDRAW only
> programs don't waste time parsing? Then the POV specific versions
> could be distributed separately from the main parts. For example:
>
> 0 IFDEF POVRAY
> 0 INCLUDE pov/coolpart.pov
> 0 ELSE
> 0 boring LDRAW version of part
> ...
> 0 ENDIF
In general, that's an interesting thought.
But in this case, I don't think it's necessary - POV already has an include
statement (IIRC).
Of course, allowing the use of such a statement raises another issue: is it
alright to distribute non-LDraw files with the LDraw parts library?
> Sorry if this has been discussed to death already...
Nope, it hadn't been brought up (in this context).
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) Well yes, but I wasn't just thinking about POV. I thought that was your point in changing the syntax. The 0 INCLUDE meta-command could be used to install custom colors much like the ldliterc.dat file. I'm sure there are plenty of other non-POV (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: L3P user primitive substitution
|
| (...) Just a thought. If the POVRAY (or whatever) sections get too big, would it make sense to add 0 INCLUDE meta-command so the LDRAW only programs don't waste time parsing? Then the POV specific versions could be distributed separately from the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
