 | | Re: rotation matrices
|
|
(...) What approach would you take? (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: There has to be an easier way.
|
|
I have an update for you Michael. I am now using 1.99 If I have three parts in my Parts List... For ease I will call them in this order and position: A 0,0,0 B 10,10,10 C -100,-100,-100 If I take a new part D and drop it onto C, D will show up at (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | About my program ELL9X.
|
|
Does anyone use my program at all? if so then I need to know if is any good and if not do need to improve it and how.... please send any comments to eduardo.harte@terra.es (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
Hello Fredrik, (...) IMHO this is the best and most compatible idea so far. I believe Don Heyse had the same idea too. Greetings, Carsten Schmitz -- Greetings, Carsten Schmitz "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
(...) Sidestepping various landmines, two ideas that come to mind for addressing this issue: 1. Allow letters in pattern id's, to increase the number of 2-digit from 100 to 1296. This could work, but would make recognition of patterned element files (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation matrices
|
|
(...) I briefly scanned the page you mentioned, it looks like it should be OK for LDraw. Paul Gyugyi uses a general rotation method for LDLite's ROTATE meta-statement, and I've implemented an equivalent in LDAO's LDL2DAT translator. But I don't know (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: rotation matrices
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure that should be: A D G 0 B E H 0 C F I 0 X Y Z 1 So multiplying (used fixed-pitch font for proper viewing): (x y z 1) (A D G 0) (B E H 0) (C F I 0) (X Y Z 1) gives (Ax + By + Cx + X Dx + Ey + Cz + Y Gx + Hy + Iz + Z 1) (...) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering [DAT]
|
|
(...) While not directly related, I've found that, while using subparts from the parts\s directory, the names will be truncated if they're more than 8 characters long and therefore won't render in LEdit or LDraw. For instance, a line like: 1 16 0 0 (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
(...) Oh yeah! It's my fav modeling tool. I seem to remember that Jeremy Sproat also said he used LEdit. (...) But will that work in LEdit? I normally specify part names in LEdit by the base file name, i.e. everything before the ".DAT" and LEdit (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: **** NEW RELEASE: MLCad V1.99 ****
|
|
(...) Nah, you have _always_ been in the mood of "... I need to find the parts in ldraw", it is not something new. ;-) Fredrik (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
Hello Tore! (...) recall that Norton Commander 5.0 for DOS (...) No. FAT16 has only limitations in the root directory for maximum number of files. That NC was limited to 2000 files was a memory allocation problem. What I meant was: 1) The first (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
This is unbearable. I propose a potential solution to the problem (URL) and nobody bothers to comment on it. Instead everyone seems to prefer to rehash the tired old arguments on the merits of various operating systems. Who cares? This has been (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Manfred Moolhuysen writes: Please no emotionful 'rich people set the pace , poor people are starving' discussions. That is off-topic. I'm a technical consultant and a programmer. So of course I have a technical point of view. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
(...) Oh, you mean that a DOS directory is limited to a specific number of files? I recall that Norton Commander 5.0 for DOS is limited to, I think it was 2000 files... -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
Yes, I run original LDraw.exe from Win 3.1/DOS 6.22 three times a year (in my 486/25 at my parents' home). I also use DOS versions of Arj.exe and PK[Un]Zip in batch procedures and when I want full control. I will probably use a DOS machine when (or (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: **** NEW RELEASE: MLCad V1.99 ****
|
|
(...) Just lately I have been the opposite. Since buying some technic just the other day I have been in the mood of "now that I have bought this lego I need to find the parts in ldraw" (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** NEW RELEASE: MLCad V1.99 ****
|
|
(...) Tim Romine here! I could not agree more! What a great job overall, but right now I'm still enjoying finding my parts where *I* put them, not where someone else makes me put them. Woo Hoo! Great Job, Michael! Tim Romine AFOL for Life (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: **** NEW RELEASE: MLCad V1.99 ****
|
|
"Michael Lachmann" <m.lachmann@xpoint.at> wrote in message news:G2L1x3.Fv6@lugnet.com... (...) ... (...) This is GREAT! Now I can pull all the Minifig parts into 1 group to make them easier to get into, and easy access to all the Wings (hmm, lots of (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
(...) And the rich set the pace ? What you say here only confirms that you're part of an economy with a relatively high consumption rate. Maybe your view of "the World" is not a realistic one. For instance, I personaly made the tranfer from MS-DOS (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterned Parts Numbering
|
|
Hello Travis, (...) That's no point. If the source of LDraw would be available it would be easy to implement long filename support... even in a DOS program. But... (...) ... if the source was never available my point if view has died. It was just a (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
