 | | Re: Parts names wanted
|
|
(...) Good point. But I wouldn't accept the wording in a catalog as 'official'. (...) Maybe. But that implies there are "beams with studs". And there aren't. The traditional "technic brick with holes" is a different animule than the new beams. Steve (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org
|
|
(...) we've seen this problem before... it seems that the ldraw.org site lives in the far depths of the internet. A lot of people seem to need more than 30 "hops" to get to it, and apparently, there's software out there that is just not patient (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org
|
|
(...) I got this: "Reply from 193.10.252.210: TTL expired it transit." "Approximate round trip time in mili-seconds - 0ms" I think this means that it didn't work. Could you please tell me what this means Thankyou Carl (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org
|
|
(...) if you are using Ienternet Explore, you must inculde the protocol like in: (URL) this still doesn't solve your problem try (if you are running windows) on the command line ("command.com" on Win9X, or cmd.com on WinNT) ping www.ldraw.org If you (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org
|
|
I tried again. It still isn't working. Why? Why? Why? Carl (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org
|
|
(...) I had no problems a minute ago. Try again well, Andreas Stabno (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | www.ldraw.org
|
|
Hi I was wondering if anyone could help me out? I can't get into www.ldraw.org I get a 'cannot find server' message. Is this the same for everyone else. Thanks Carl Watson <I don't have a catchy signature yet> (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Part name and number wanted ;-)
|
|
(...) Excellent, thanks. Any guess on the part number? What are the procedures if the isn't any embedded number on the piece? Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Part name and number wanted ;-)
|
|
(...) How about something like Brick 1 x 1 Round with Three Leaves on Side Fredrik (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Yet another Part name and number wanted ;-)
|
|
Hi, I'm trying to make a mockup for the small three-leafed plant piece like the one you can find in 7128 Speeder Bikes or 6045 Ninja Surprise. I can't find a part number on the piece itself, and naming it "three-leafed plant thingamajik" wouldn't (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone help me with this?
|
|
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000 6:15:28 -0600, Jay Cal wrote (in message <G0rwps.Iun@lugnet.com>): (...) If you use L3PAO, you can specify more light sources. Using Light.dat (as far as I know) specifies a point source. I haven't really messed with this, but I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:G0sn7p.M08@lugnet.com... (...) This sounds like an interesting idea. I'd like to hear more. Adam (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | new part - minifig skeleton arm (6265.dat) [DAT]
|
|
Hi! I just finished up this version of the Minifig Skeleton Arm. I say "this version" 'cuz I had to inline some not-yet-official primitives into it (see "(URL) for more info), and I will want to update this part once [read "if"] the not-yet-official (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | unofficial new primitive -- "Rounded Corner" [DAT]
|
|
Hi, While encoding the Arm piece for the Minifig Skeleton, I encountered something for which I needed a primitive (and I couldn't find anything like it among the existing primitives). At the "wrist" of the Skeleton Arm, there are four (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Intersection of 2 3D lines?
|
|
Travis Cobbs skrev i meddelandet ... (...) I have C-code at work to solve this, even if the lines are not co-planar. It calculates one point on each line (the 'nearest points'), and if they are the same, the lines are co-planar. Mail me at ai@cej.se (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts names wanted
|
|
(...) So does LegoCo. (E.g., "Small Beams and Plates", set # 5228, on pg. 58 of the newest catalog I've received, "Explore New Worlds" title.) In my mind, that makes it "official". (But then again, I could be wrong.) (...) "Technic Beam (No Studs)" (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts names wanted
|
|
(...) I bet Eelco didn't expect this depth of response. I've noted your comments. I don't know if these changes will be included in the 2000-02 update or not. (...) Maybe "Smooth Beam". I dunno. (...) I haven't heard of "Softline", but I wonder if (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Intersection of 2 3D lines?
|
|
Thanks to both of you. Given that this newsgroup covers both part development and cad program development (with part development getting more posts for obvious reasons), I probably should have specified that I needed to do this programatically. (On (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts names wanted
|
|
I'm glad to see some good part name thinking has come up. (...) Your term "Open Center" and the reversed order is much better than my suggestion was. I agree with this name. (...) Of course, can't do without the size. Agree. (...) [snip] (...) (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Off-topic: website building
|
|
"Ryan J Farrington" <ryanjf2@juno.com> wrote in message news:20000913.090209...uno.com... (...) Though you did certainly hit an appropriate group to gain the attention of web authors/designers, I think the question was a tad too off-topic. Why not (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
