Subject:
|
Re: Parts names wanted
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:01:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1264 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Franklin W. Cain wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, many people use "beam" to refer to LDraw's
> > > "Technic Brick" pieces.
>
> So does LegoCo.
> (E.g., "Small Beams and Plates", set # 5228,
> on pg. 58 of the newest catalog I've received,
> "Explore New Worlds" title.)
> In my mind, that makes it "official".
> (But then again, I could be wrong.)
Good point. But I wouldn't accept the wording in a catalog as 'official'.
> > > Are there any other labels we could use?
> > > ... maybe "Technic Tile Beam"? (yuck)
> >
> > "Technic Rounded Beam"
> > "Technic Smooth Beam"
> > "Technic Softline Beam"
>
> "Technic Beam (No Studs)"
> "Technic Beam Studless"
Maybe. But that implies there are "beams with studs". And there aren't.
The traditional "technic brick with holes" is a different animule than the
new beams.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts names wanted
|
| (...) So does LegoCo. (E.g., "Small Beams and Plates", set # 5228, on pg. 58 of the newest catalog I've received, "Explore New Worlds" title.) In my mind, that makes it "official". (But then again, I could be wrong.) (...) "Technic Beam (No Studs)" (...) (24 years ago, 13-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
