 | | Re: MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost)
|
|
(...) Wow, that's huge! Unfortunately, it's hard to get the full effect with a DAT file this big. Do you plan on rendering any raytraces? I'm sure that with some nice pics, more people would comment. From what I can tell, though, it looks like (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
(...) LOL! I guess I wasn't paying attention to the original post... good thing I don't own a car... ;-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
(...) First, it isn't real, it's a parody of aftermarket tuning for real cars... and if you hop around to some sites regarding that topic, I think you'll find that $6499.00 is a reasonable price for a complete twin-turbo kit :) J (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | LDAO Minifig Modeler
|
|
So, I've been away from all of this Lego modelling craziness for a while, but recently the bug bit me again,[1] and I started downloading all of the bits and setting up Virtual PC. I have LDraw and the latest updates, LDLite, LDAO, etc. installed (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
Is that price right? $6499? Or should that be, maybe, $64.99...? Just wondering, not criticizing, yah? I don't have a super-car, so I don't count anyhow ;-) -Shiri (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8880 Supercar Performance Upgrades
|
|
(...) Supercar? (...) Hopping up my real car is bad enough. Now i have to tweak my lego ones as well? This could get expensive. I realy like the design. Cale (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: problems w/ L3P
|
|
L3P is a DOS program. You can NOT run it by double-clicking on it in the Explorer. You must run it in a DOS window (a DOS-box). Open a DOS window (Start/Programs/MS-DOS-prompt) There are two requirements to run L3P: 1) DOS must know where to find (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.31 - Added PIPE
|
|
(...) There's an idea. Might as well wait until the command-line polling API for L3Lab is implemented and published... Steve (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: problems w/ L3P
|
|
(...) nyhedsmeddelelse:FtJ...net.com... (...) the (...) key (...) Sorry but I know almost nothing about MS-DOS so could you help me out? I got the DOS box up, but not w/ L3P -kyle |¯¯¯| | | (@ @) +--------oOO---(_)---...---+ | / (URL) \ | |/ \| |\ (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo lunar module (repost) [DAT]
|
|
M.S.F.C. - Minifig Space Flight Center a sub-division of LASA - Lego(tm) Aeronautics and Space Administration 26. April 2000 TO: All concerned parties FROM: Axel F. Poque, Assoc. Admin. MSFC SUBJECT: Full-scale LM model review readiness We are proud (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo lunar rover (modified) (repost) [DAT]
|
|
The original post got scrambled thanks to Outlook's reformatting "feature", so here it is once again... This is the modified version of my lunar rover to go along with the lunar module. Enjoy! ---...--- -- <`) Axel (F.) Poque /V\ axel.pq@t-online.de (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: LDS ver 0.31 - Added PIPE
|
|
Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet ... (...) No. LDSShell is based on my Delphi port of LDLite 0.<something quite early>, and the meta commands were not yet included then. Real Life takes it's toll, so I don't see an update possible for a long, long (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo lunar surface equipment (repost) [DAT]
|
|
Seems I fell victim to Outlook's Automatic Reformatting feature again, so here's it again... (BTW: how do I cancel a post on LUGNET?) I've tried to build most of the actual experiments of the Apollo lunar missions (so you have got something to play (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo Lunar Surface Equipment [DAT]
|
|
I've tried to build most of the actual experiments of the Apollo lunar missions (so you've got something to play with). If your favourite experiment is missíng of if you've got a better way of building it, please let me know. P.S.: Don't forget to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo Lunar Rover (modified) [DAT]
|
|
This is the modified version of my lunar rover to go along with the lunar module. Enjoy! ---...--- -- <`) Axel (F.) Poque /V\ axel.pq@t-online.de powered by |_ ][ ]\[ [_] >< (_)> ---...--- ~~ -- 0 FILE LRfold.dat 0 Lunar Rover (foldable) 0 Name: (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | MOC: Apollo Lunar Module [DAT]
|
|
M.S.F.C. - Minifig Space Flight Center a sub-division of LASA - Lego(tm) Aeronautics and Space Administration 26. April 2000 TO: All concerned parties FROM: Axel F. Poque, Assoc. Admin. MSFC SUBJECT: Full-scale LM model ready for review We are proud (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3Lab and BFC
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm using the latest (non-released) version of LDAO. Which shouldn't matter, the LDAO->L3Lab interface is the same. I'm using L3Lab to view files as I edit them. I start an Edit session, L3Lab gives me the warning about my video being set (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Hmm, I see your point. Except that the desired orientation of a subfile may be known before that subfile is certified. Here's a (somewhat contrived) example: we've discussed defining the standard orientation of all primitive files to be (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: R2D2 Head
|
|
(...) You're right, and you're wrong. I found a mockup Karim posted awhile ago. I like how he simulated the head-details with the band of blue quads. Steve (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Things for the next part update
|
|
(...) Well... (...) Which isn't *exactly* a meta-command. It's the file-title, which contains useful (but redundant) information. (...) Hmmm. Steve (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
