 | | Re: 32165 Technic Throwbot Head
|
|
Wow! What a part! Great work! If there is one thing I can nitpick about, it would be the lower "partial" axle hole. The real part has two small "nibs" on the lower portion, which are used to hold an axle in place. You can hear a "click" sound if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
This part certainly looks very good! I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does have (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring
|
|
The part does not appear to have the "clip" detail which is seen in the centre of the real part. But the part still looks great, so I would definitively vote for it in the LCAD update. Great work! I also agree with your choice of orientation. (I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Driving Ring 0 Name: 6539.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool 0 Un-Official LCad part 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -4 0 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 5 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) I have done something like that for LeoCAD, it removes the studs above and below the bricks and plates for the rendering. I haven't added this option for the POV-Ray export but that's something that I can do if you want. Leonardo (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) JPG is NOT lossy, i.e. it's NOT required to be lossy, it can be defined to be 100% accurate ! (...) Actually I think that the best format is the GIF format, due to the type of compressing it uses and our specific renderer used for the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) Argh! Didn't think of that... :o/ /Tore (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW models and pictures
|
|
(...) Of course! Here it is: plane { z,0 pigment { image_map { sys "bushes.bmp" } scale <300,300,1> } normal { bump_map { sys "bushes.bmp" bump_size 10} scale <300,300,1> } finish { ambient 0.2 diffuse 0.2 } rotate <90,0,0> translate <0,140,0> } I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: 6631.dat Technic Changeover Plate
|
|
Marc Klein <marckl@easynet.fr> wrote in message news:38de6aa6.717081...net.com... (...) Looks great! -John Van (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fry8p1.1MF@lugnet.com... (...) Very nice. I noticed something interesting when viewing this part. The shading in L3Lab and LDLite is not applied to edgelines, so the white edgelines in the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: new part - 71014 Castle Greatsword
|
|
Franklin W. Cain <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FrxKs8.IGz@lugnet.com... (...) Franklin, Thanks for your committment to creating quality parts! I predict you will become a true part artist! -John Van (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Tore Eriksson <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:38DE84F4.380C9D...pnet.se... (...) only those standard bricks, plates, and tiles (...) could be a way to free up some resources for (...) somehow, and I don't know exactly how (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Big shock absorber
|
|
Hi I've send a message past few weeks about large shock absorber. Someone answer me that this part was still on work, because of the variable length of this part. But unfortunately, i don't find this message. I only remember it was possible to send (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine for Minifigs, but I gave up because I could'nt build it right. It started looking like a truck and things only got worse from there. The hardest part that I could not figure out was how to fold the wheels under (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) colour < 47) ), interior can be skipped. Of course you mean above the lower edge relative to the parts current orientation. That would require taking the transformation matrix into account. -Chuck (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 6889/6939 combo Alternate (roc n' rule) [DAT]
|
|
i like the godzilla models that the clone brand kawada came out with so here is my attempt at Rodan. there's a spot on the back for a rider/pilot to sit. ..joseph g 0 ROC N' ROLL - 6889/6939 combo Alternate 0 Name: ROCNROLL.DAT 0 Author: Joseph (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) For basic bricks, slopes, plates and tiles, one could simply remove the studs and then make the simplified part as the bounding box of what remains. This could probably be automated. If one want more details, the studs could be added again (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Problem with primitives?
|
|
I've been screwing around with some part authoring, and I give a big Thank You to Lars Hassing for L3Lab and L3P, both of which have made proofing much easier than rendering and rerendering and rererendering in LDraw. However, I notice that on one (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE? [DAT]
|
|
(...) You mean something like: 0 Brick 2 x 4 0 Name: 3001.dat 0 INTERIOR BEGIN 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 16 box5.dat 4 (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 6970
|
|
Great model. Looks good for the OMR when the planet logo parts are made official. I assume you are going to put it up for the ldraw.org official model repository. There is 1 problem with the dat file that I can see: it is missing the flag that is (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets)
|
