Subject:
|
Re: Shogun, BAM (Big *** Mech)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 20:53:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
806 times
|
| |
|
|
First, apologies if this creates a second post, I must of hit the wrong button
or something. Not seeing my reply.
In lugnet.build.mecha, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Neumann wrote:
Great work, Mark.
|
Thanks Kevin.
| |
I’ve always classified Mecha into 2 classes: Spacey and Technicy
This mech shows a perfect mix of the two. It is the best wormgear & technic
turntable mech I’ve seen in quite a while.
|
I agree. There seems to be the trend that people make mechs that look really
cool and are (almost always) static or are completely mobile but are more an
extercize in technic building. Not always the case but usually. I’m really
striving to figure out how to blend the two, so that we can have our cool mechs
and make them move too.
This comment meant a lot to me, thank you.
| |
The poses with the gun are amazingly life-like.
|
hehehe, yeah. I believe that if you do mech building, you indadvertantly become
a student of biology. Which is funny because I sucked at that in school.
| |
And now, some closing thoughts: “very utilitarian looking... dangerous in
its own way... kind of a grey complexion... needs more hair.”
~Kevoh
|
I dig it man. Thank you.
Mark Neumann
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Shogun, BAM (Big *** Mech)
|
| (...) Great work, Mark. I've always classified Mecha into 2 classes: Spacey and Technicy This mech shows a perfect mix of the two. It is the best wormgear & technic turntable mech I've seen in quite a while. The poses with the gun are amazingly (...) (19 years ago, 6-Feb-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
