Subject:
|
Re: 60 degree problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:14:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1095 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown writes:
> James Brown writes:
> > I've got a design problem that I'm having a hard time working around - • normally
> > I'd just drop the design, but this one has such great possibilities I'd hate • to
> > have to do that.
> >
> > I'm building an articulated 3-claw foot, based off of 1x4/2x2 hinge plates as • a
> > center-point, arranged so:
> >
> > ||
> > //\\
>
> Ok, it's fairly obvious I wasn't clear enough (I can't even figure out what I
> meant <grin>) so here is a second attempt. The part I am using as the major
> component of my foot design is the (aucZILLA designation)1x4/2x2 corner- • connect
> plate hinges. Using 1, 2, and 3 to represent stud locations from the three
> hinge-plates, I will attempt a clearer ASCII drawing. 'x' represents the
> equilateral triangle formed by the three sides - hence the original title of • my
> post. The '/' are there because LUGnet tried to interpret this as a .dat file
> without them.
>
>
> / 1 3 3 2
> / 1 3 3 2
> / x
> / 1 2
> / 1 2
>
> Essentially, a perfect 120 "y".
> That still doesn't quite get the angles right, but I think it gets the point
> across. I have connected the hinges together with 2x2 plates over each of the
> three 'sides' so there is no freedom of motion in the hinges (alternating • these
> layers makes for a very solid structure), and am trying to figure out a way to
> anchor a single larger plate to all three orientations.
>
> My original question still stands - does anyone have a solution for me?
Have you tried a Technic 3 blade rotor? It's not *quite* what you are trying
to build, but I think it should be workable.
Duane
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) A 3 blade rotor will give the same angle geometry but I don't beleive it is what James is asking. I believe he is asking how to anchor something to the top of this assembly that is connected to all three legs. Geometrically, there is no (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) normally (...) to (...) a (...) Ok, it's fairly obvious I wasn't clear enough (I can't even figure out what I meant <grin>) so here is a second attempt. The part I am using as the major component of my foot design is the (aucZILLA (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
