 | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Well, if I may jump in here to defend myself-- my only point is, if it's to what I think Lar is referring, is that I think scientists today (in general) think they've got a pretty good idea as to what's up in the universe. I say they don't (...) (25 years ago, 15-Oct-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Matt Marshall
|
| | | | <snip> (...) actually (...) Just what is wrong with those words? They are only "bad" because we think they are. It's just a self fufilling phrophecy(1) I mean they are very general purpose words, and unless used to intentionally insult someone they (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | (...) I agree, to a point. I think these words tend to insult people even when they're not intended to. [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING UP] [WARNING BAD WORDS COMING (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Tobias Möller
|
| | | | | | | <SNIP> (...) WORDS (...) WORDS (...) interface (...) it (...) it's (...) case, (...) a (...) Well, then maybe you don´t like me... I write four asterisks "****" instead of a bad word, that I don´t like to use. --Tobias (...) I (...) It (...) (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well, just to put the $.02 in that I never did, I'd say that when writing, either avoid swears all together, or use 'em. The insult/resentment of reading a swear is not in the word itself, as Jeremy pointed out, but in the intention. Hence, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | (...) here's a fun one I thought of a while back- Given- showing a man shirtless on TV with nipples exposed is ok. Given- showing a shirtless woman on TV is ok as long as we black out the nipples. Question- If I were to take the area of the woman's (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) What cracks me up is that a woman's nipple is the single most useful item on the breast. It's like, showing a water fountain, but blacking out the nozzle. How did breasts get to be so obscene? IMO, a thong bikini is more obscene (and painful (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) First, to answer Christopher-- No, it's not ok-- get into therapy NOW;-) (...) Well, give guys a break, sproat. There are mitigating factors involved, such as the fact that we are genetically programmed to respond in a sexual way to breasts (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Jameson Robert Gagnepain
|
| | | | <snip> (...) The "F bomb" has arrived many times already... I hear F*ck and D*mn and B*tch and B*stard on the Simpsons all the time.... Jameson Robert Gagnepain (URL) 17714608 (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) You don't watch TV, but you hear these words on the Simpsons "all the time"? That's a neat trick! On which episode has the F word been used? I'm pretty sure I've seen them all, and I've never heard that. Dave! (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) What you are responding to is some creative snipping. I'm pretty sure that footnote regarding Chicago Hope is from one of my posts a while ago. The person who said that the F bomb has arrived many times already *wasn't* me. (...) Yeah, I was (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Doh! Was that my snipping error? If so, I apologize for getting in your face about it. (...) I'll have to watch more carefully in the future--who knows what I'm missing? Dave! (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Best selection of parts to mess around with —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) ITYM South Park. Jasper (25 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
