| |
In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
> * output would be a unique MPD file, each animation step being separated by a
> CLEAR statement
What's the Pro with MPD files in this case? My experince is that it makes
programming much, much more difficult, and the gain is...(?) In LDA, I inlined
all submodels into one model DAT* file for each Frame, and then one Master DAT
file that calls all Frames separated by a STEP and a CLEAR statement.
*(Today I would of course have given them the LDR extension...)
>
> The Pros:
> * no change to existing standard material
> * unlimited expressive power
>
> The Cons:
> * previous POV work would be not supported
> * advanced OCaml programming quickly ressembles academic math work
* and yet another programming syntax to learn...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw Animation - Why MPD?
|
| (...) Not really a big deal, i could change my mind if that's too difficult for me to program. (...) It's much worse than a new syntax. A whole new, entirely different programming paradigm to learn. A whole new program semantic. Almost any (...) (19 years ago, 28-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation)
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
