Subject:
|
Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:59:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1737 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Stefan Gustavson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
> >
> > Whatever loud users will scream for, what will eventually be
> > delivered is step n°4 (an interpreted animation scripting language).
>
> I think it would be wise to include a step 3.5:
> We first need some means for saving animation data,
> i.e. we need to design and agree upon a file format
> for time-varying LDraw data.
>
> Without that, we might end up with the situation that
> is still crippling some aspects of the otherwise very
> successful RenderMan graphics standard: the file format
> for RenderMan input is static, and each frame is actually
> a still image generated from other, non-standard and
> often proprietary scene description formats.
You mean a movement should be a continuous function rather than successives
position interpolations. If that's you mean then i agree. If not, can you be
more explicit?
Damien
web page: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/alphablock/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| (...) I think it would be wise to include a step 3.5: We first need some means for saving animation data, i.e. we need to design and agree upon a file format for time-varying LDraw data. Without that, we might end up with the situation that is still (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
