Subject:
|
Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:22:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1760 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
>
> Whatever loud users will scream for, what will eventually be
> delivered is step n°4 (an interpreted animation scripting language).
I think it would be wise to include a step 3.5:
We first need some means for saving animation data,
i.e. we need to design and agree upon a file format
for time-varying LDraw data.
Without that, we might end up with the situation that
is still crippling some aspects of the otherwise very
successful RenderMan graphics standard: the file format
for RenderMan input is static, and each frame is actually
a still image generated from other, non-standard and
often proprietary scene description formats.
I am not saying this is easy. I am saying, like you,
that this is hard. But it can be done, and I would
like to see it. The connection database that was
attempted (is that project still alive?) is a clear and
commendable step towards LDraw animation capabilities.
Stefan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| (...) You mean a movement should be a continuous function rather than successives position interpolations. If that's you mean then i agree. If not, can you be more explicit? Damien web page: (URL) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| The textual and the graphical ***...*** The history of computers, user interfaces, and LDraw are basically the same: 1. a command-line tool offers the initial functionality 2. a point & click GUI layer hides the initial tool 3. eventually everybody (...) (19 years ago, 21-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
