Subject:
|
Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:04:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2032 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Allister McLaren wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad, Damien Guichard wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This is why i think LDraw users should stop whining about the lack of an
> > > animation-enabled LDraw graphical tool, as long as no such tool even exists in a
> > > textual form.
> > > The textual step simply can't be avoided.
> >
> >
> > I'm no boffin, but doesn't POVray already do this?
> >
> > Allister
>
> MLCad + L3P + POVray does static pictures, greatly limited when it comes to
> animation scripting capability.
I have been working on what you want for 5 years. At first I came up with Lani
as a language.
http://james.magnusviri.com/lego/lani/details.html
It sucks. I now use POV-Ray. Have you learned POV-Ray? Have you seen this:
http://www.ldraw.org/article/348
I fully agree, POV-Ray isn't as powerful as, say, Maya. But it is as powerful
as you are going to get in free software.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: My humble opinion about LDraw animation
|
| (...) I downloaded Lani long time ago, not deeply tested it but i wouldn't say it sucks. I know about POV-Ray, ray-tracing primitives and Constructive Solid Geometry. My lego POV-Ray gallery: (URL) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
