To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / *395 (-20)
  Re: Sell: 18" Display Lego Figures!! 6 different types!
 
(...) Yup, I was just about to do so. but thanks for pointing it out. -Suz (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Sell: 18" Display Lego Figures!! 6 different types!
 
This message has been posted repeatedly over the past several days, in violation of the LUGNET terms of service. Please stop. --Bill. XFUT: lugnet.admin.terms (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS
 
(...) I agree, Frank. I'm working on eliminating the holdup now. Expect an announcement about this soon. -Suz LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS
 
<rwebb@enohspamaltavista.net> wrote in message news:Gpxx64.3FL@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Or perhaps lugnet.people-who-ac...ugnet-turn ing-into-usenet? At least that's what my post was. Taking the previous posts as a hypothetical situation and (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS
 
Hi all I think I need to reply to this with more than "sorry". My first thought was that two words ought to suffice. But where's the proportion in all of this ? Yes, I've posted to the .market tree before, BUT have never really digested that (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
 
(...) This is too bad. If he's been following LUGNET for this long, he does [most likely] know better. This is exactly the attitude we DON'T need on LUGNET - people flaunting the charters and disrespecting other groups for their financial gain. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
 
This is a pretty good example of how telling people where to post stuff doesn't do much good. I don't know Ronan myself, but I think he has been around for quite some time. The People listing shows that he has been a lugnet member since 23-Nov-2000. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
 
(...) I second this wholeheartedly. (...) Too bad its taken this long. It should have been changed a while ago. -Tim (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Market posts and TOS (was Re: Black Cat 5571 + 5563 + 5561)
 
(...) There has been talk for ages about changing the TOS to disallow market posts outside the .market hierarchy (presumably they would remain ok in org groups as those groups desire, and shopping tips would remain ok in the .loc groups), and Suz (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms) ! 
 
  Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
 
(...) I guess his opinion on the matter is different. All posts are not always going to be shunted to the optimal topic header and that's OK. All the moderation, curating, good intentions or FREAKING OUT in the world is going to change that. If it (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
 
(...) Um, why? That is, why forward this particular post rather than making a statement along the lines of "hey general readers, there's a discussion that you ought to read and it starts here [cite to head of tree]" ?? Should everyone forward posts (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
 
(...) <snip> (...) One reason someone may want to post about BB sales would be if they are having a set time frame sale or maybe free shipping for a short period of time only. That would not show up in the wanted emails or the search. Julie (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
 
(...) Which then determines whether people actually read the group (and thus whether it merits existence). After all, I can think of no Earthly reason why anyone would want to read BrickBay sales info (since Dan has done a great job with the search (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
 
(...) Just what posts belong in .brickshops has been discussed before with no official conclusion: (URL) way I, and some others, interpret the charter of .brickshops is that it is for discusion of brickshops (*mentioned* in the charter) and not for (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Apology.
 
(...) 1. I set follow-ups to admin.general: (URL) Tamara replies to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general: (URL) I replied to Tamara's post without noticing the FUT & I apologise: (URL) James gives me a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Liquidation World Lego
 
(...) Hmm, me thinks (URL) needs to be updated. Someone using NNTP would not easily be able to find this. This raises an interesting question, how do we keep apprised of changes in the TOS? How does someone coming in fresh find all the TOS (they get (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Liquidation World Lego
 
See the following posts (URL) under the main header. Rose "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3C1E05A4.970C6D...ing.com... (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Apology.
 
Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this: "Ban him. Scott A FUT lugent.admin.general x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at least is should." (...) Personally, I think Scott should be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Liquidation World Lego
 
(...) Actually I've got a question about that. Is it really against the TOS for these types of requests? I know folks have often asked here for people willing to buy this or that which is on limited distribution. No on the other hand, if you have no (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Apology.
 
(...) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR