To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / *325 (-20)
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Offer accepted graciously. (Almost verbatim) (URL) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Oops...actual typo that! OK, lets make it: Shiri Dori, The Dutchess of Acronym, The Princess of Castle World, Protector of the LUGNET Realm, and All-Around Swell Gal © Nighty-night! (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) That's Dutchess, and you left out Castle World. g'night -Shiri (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) (Yeah, I know that... 8?) ) I think I shall dub thee: *** Shiri Dori, The Duchess of Acronym and All-Around Swell Gal © *** Matt (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) I bet you know this and are just teasing Kyle, but I have to cite something in response to *one* of your posts! (URL) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Kyle, You might want to check on your newsreader program...it seems to be holding messages you meant to post when the thread was fresh! ;?P Seriously though, Todd is working on stuff...that's as good as it can get, except for fighting the good (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) [snipped lots more] I think the problem here is that no fraud or theft has been committed (note IANAL!). The other regs you quoted implied a similar requirement. *However*, if paid membership were a requirement for posting, and the identity (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
In further addendum to my previous two posts, it has been requested that the relevant codes of law as pertain to identity theft be cited, and referenced on the Federal Trade Commission's web site. I have taken my own personal time to research and (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) Specifically, an individual who has been banned for Violations of the TOS, and who continues to post under "stolen" identities. (...) This (violating the communities rules) is excactly why this individual's posting privileges were revoked in (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
(...) I don't know what the "blatant identity thefts" were, but: Do the feds _really_ want to hear about usenet posts with spoofed IDs? Not judging by the site that you linked to. Please point out the relevant part that I missed. A little more (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Identity Theft
 
As an addendum to my prior post, I have copied the relevant portions of the LUGNET TERMS OF USE AGREEMENT (Version 1.0.1, 7 Mar 2000) here. Remember, these are the rules and standards that each and every individual posting to LUGNET agrees to abide (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Identity Theft
 
To the LUGNET membership, I have seen two blatant cases of identity theft in LUGNET newsgroups today (2001.05.24). This is in direct violation of the sections 'Acknowledgment and Acceptance of Terms of Use (6)' and 'Discussion Group Terms and (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms) !! 
 
  Re: Hey Todd, terms/charter type question
 
(...) I have been polite about it, friendly reminder type of thing, like I said I have off two of these recently for b.s.t. My emailer doesn't support bcc (as far as I know anyways) so that's kind of hard to do directly, if you want I can either (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Hey Todd, terms/charter type question
 
(...) No, as long as you're reasonably polite about it, I don't have any problem with you emailing people directly and asking if they could stop. You could also BCC me on the mail if you like. (...) If that's not something you feel comfortable (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Spam spam spam, wonderful spam... (was Re: Fwd: GASOLINE PRICES
 
(...) Argh. If the ToS doesn't directly cover plain old spam, it really should, and in no uncertain terms. This is obviously a case of the sender just doing a bulk mail-out, as so fervently requested in the original message; I feel sorry for the (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Spam spam spam, wonderful spam... (was Re: Fwd: GASOLINE PRICES
 
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> Interesting. I just did a scan of the ToS for "spam", and then a slightly more careful read, and while "auction spam" is expressly prohibited, just plain old spam isn't, or else I missed it. Item 12 sort of tangentially (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) It may also have been a misreading of this statement: (...) I've got some very mixed feelings about the April Fools jokes. This has been kicked off by the current business with the supposed NGLTC highway cleanup sign. One thing I'm really (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) Right... so users promise that the info they give about themselves is true, but not that information in particular posts is. Since we're coming up on April, I guess I think that's a good thing! (even though I am convinced I have "sucker" taped (...) (23 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) I'm not aware of anything in the TOS/T&C[1] about this either. Alex may be thinking of the news-posting setup form[2], where there is a checkbox that says: "I swear that all the information I am submitting on this page is correct and that I am (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) I agree. In the past I have mailed posters to tell them of their "errors" - it saves all this huff and puff. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR