 | | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Mark, You replied to a User's post[1] with a rationale for why the particular newsgroup belongs on another part of LUGNET. The post in question is perfectly on-topic for the newsgroup it is placed in, fully within the Charter of that group (...) (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Again Leonard - I never said it was off topic for the group it was in. Why you keep going back to this point is truly beyond me. Please understand this simple point. My point, again, was the group ITSELF is in the wrong place. As anal as some (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Mark - While I happen to personally agree with the point you are trying to make (to an extent), from an administrative perspective, I don't agree with the way you're trying to make it. Being combative with Lenny isn't going to get you any (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Sorry Tim - I was asking honest questions in a very polite way. I was asking honest and fair questions. I was making honest and true suggestions directed to Todd, the owner of this website, in a very polite manner Then Leonard comes in and (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) I don't have anything to add. (...) If you have something to say to me only, the most effective way to do that is to send it through private e-mail. By the way, I don't appreciate you calling Lenny and Tim lackeys. (...) Lenny misunderstood in (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Tim's message was not misplaced, Mark, and you are disrespecting him by telling him that. (...) Perhaps nothing "wrong" but certainly disrespectful. When you said: "If you want to talk about finding your soul mate or others want to talk about (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote: . (...) understood and noted. (...) It was not meant in a negative manner. (...) Then with all due respect Todd, he should have taken the time to read past the first sentance. I posted what I was (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Yes it was misplaced. I was not in the wrong - and Leonard's refusal to comprehend is where the problem started, not with me. (...) WRONG. 100% WRONG Todd. Really, what is hard to understand about what I am saying. Let me pull a quote: "the (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) Yup. I heard you say that loud and clear. (...) Still yes. (...) It shows disrespect to post a direct reply to a random and innocent message in a group when you think that the group itself is misplaced, and not the message. It also shows (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) good ;) But that is not what you said I was asking for. So I am glad it is NOW yes, but I don't think it is "still yes". (...) I am sorry you took that as disrespectful. It was not the intention. More on this below (1). (...) See, I would (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) That was really a not cool thing of you to just say. (...) The extent to which any given group is "on-topic" (e.g., LEGO-focused) or "off-topic" (e.g., non-LEGO) is not a 0 or 1 but a fuzzy value in-between. For example, many posts in the .loc (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) lol, whatever Todd. Look - everybody has brain farts - Leonard just happend to have a very large one here (I assume). I am not, and did not say he is like that in general - just on that one point. There is a difference between these: But my 3 (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) quite amazing how this is revolving around how a lugnet admin actually did not ignore you, replied to your postm, and made you feel like a responsible person of society, and you blew up at him and judged his intelligence to that of a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Papenfuss wrote: <snip> (...) Wow. And I thought I was arrogant. ;) Dave K (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
