To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 1057
1056  |  1058
Subject: 
Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:14:25 GMT
Viewed: 
3172 times
  
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
But my 3 year old listens, and understands, better than Leonard did there.

That was really a not cool thing of you to just say.

I find it odd that these 100% off-topic posts (despite the fact the posts
themselves may be in the correct group – the point is the group itself is
in the wrong group) are allowed outside the off-topic forum.

The extent to which any given group is "on-topic" (e.g., LEGO-focused) or
"off-topic" (e.g., non-LEGO) is not a 0 or 1 but a fuzzy value in-between.
For example, many posts in the .loc area are non-LEGO-related, as are most
posts in the .admin area.  If you look harder you will also find a group
here called .robotics.handyboard, which is only marginally related to LEGO.

The purpose of the .off-topic tree is to collect certain groups which are
known *a priori* to be non-LEGO-related.  The .off-topic area is *not* for
*all* non-LEGO-related discussion.  A certain amount of non-LEGO discussion
is tolerated in *every* group.  It's up to the participants of each group
to decide over time how much is appropriate for that group.

I hope this clears up any confusion which may remain.

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
 
(...) lol, whatever Todd. Look - everybody has brain farts - Leonard just happend to have a very large one here (I assume). I am not, and did not say he is like that in general - just on that one point. There is a difference between these: But my 3 (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
 
(...) good ;) But that is not what you said I was asking for. So I am glad it is NOW yes, but I don't think it is "still yes". (...) I am sorry you took that as disrespectful. It was not the intention. More on this below (1). (...) See, I would (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)

14 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR