Subject:
|
Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:07:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2467 times
|
| |
|
|
> > But more to the point, I find this whole post and the tactic it represents as
> > being low and unfair.
>
> Shame you think that Leonard - I am not in any way trying ot do what you are
> attemptint ot twist my intentions into.
Mark,
You replied to a User's post[1] with a rationale for why the particular
newsgroup belongs on another part of LUGNET. The post in question is perfectly
on-topic for the newsgroup it is placed in, fully within the Charter of that
group (.people.singles). Your reply, however, is completely off-topic. If you
have a problem with a newsgroup charter, the sole place for that discussion is
in the .admin heirarchy[2].
I am concerned about other Users being 'attacked' with reasons why their post
belongs in off-topic.
Furthermore, if you are out-lining why .people discussion belongs in off-topic,
then please be advised that we (the LUGNET Administration) are aware of your
opinion, and have taken it under advisement. There is no need to continually
repeat your argument.
-Lenny Hoffman
Member #1168
Content Coordinator
[1] When Todd posts with his @lugnet.com address, he is acting as an
Administrator of Lugnet. When Todd is not, he is acting as a User and should be
accorded the same respect/hands-off attitude that every other User is afforded.
[2] And certainly not as a reply to a non-.admin post or in the .people.singles
group.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
| (...) Again Leonard - I never said it was off topic for the group it was in. Why you keep going back to this point is truly beyond me. Please understand this simple point. My point, again, was the group ITSELF is in the wrong place. As anal as some (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
