|
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I like this, but it would be important that they were all presented together on the web page so that it was obvious they were similar in nature. (...) OK, so where will .nelug (for example) sit? If you slap it under .us it's too broad an (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|  
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.230)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I have mixed feelings about trying to apply order in matters of speech. I appreciate trying to make things orderly, and by segregating posts to areas they would be sought in would avoid flames from people who have to wade through messages (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Woah that's one heck of a CC: list up there! Funny, one of which I subscribe too (announce).. and I don't believe that one accepts replies? Todd Lehman wrote: <SNIP lots of message :) > (...) Does debate not fit this area already? I'm unsure as I've (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Gino A. Melone wrote in message ... (...) moderate I disagree on this one. The Idaho group has not seen much traffic, but then again there aren't many of us. As LUGNET membership gets larger, I would expect our Idaho group to become active at some (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) in (...) Any (...) What about market.auction and market.nonauction. I of course would like to see market.auction.Ebay, market auction.nonebay, market.nonauction(sales?), or market.non auction sale.buy trade Rather (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) replace (...) lugnet.market (...) I have to "me too" on this post. James has stated me feelings on this quite well. I generally don't even go to auctions, but then I miss the personal auctions that people run (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message <3aa34df1.136496190@...et.com>... (...) I wish you would expand sale to two groups, Ebay and Non-Ebay. (...) How about having a definition that would exclude "for profit" posts. This way if you found a local sale or (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) definitely add these three if for no other reason than to give us somewhere to boot people who keep posting this cr*p in our other ng's (...) well, i like monitoring only one ng, buy-sell-trade, but even if split up (which it really should) it (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.228)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I think that lugnet.debate would be useful for on-topic controversy (eg perennial faves "does Lego encourage violence?", "why are all minifigs yellow?", "how much does juniorisation suck?"). It should be a default skip-filter though, as should (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Nonononono, nobody would be required to post raving praise to .rave; the rave area would just be safe haven for raving -- a place where you can't (shouldn't) be chastised for saying nice things, or where you can go to always read nice things. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I'm not sure it would be a good idea to add either of these groups. On the surface it seems great...but I see a potential let-down. When I read discussions in Lugnet, it seems to me that positive and negative conversations add to the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa41e91.189907...net.com... (...) (.loc.au.vic), (...) per (...) think (...) Even (...) yep, basically I think that would work well _with .loc.au_ other countries may vary. (...) in (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.227)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Interesting ideas. I look forward to the changes coming to Lugnet. Being serious, I think the Rant newsgroup should be .racers. Or something else that clearly implies the rant and upset-at-Lego sentiments immediately. Just a suggestion that likely (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.226)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Yea, that is a problem with using "swap", I guess one factor for me in not breaking it down too much is that while a number of offers are clearly auctions, there are just a few which are pretty strictly trades, and everything else is somewhere (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.226)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 1.226)
|
