To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 283
282  |  284
Subject: 
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:28:30 GMT
Viewed: 
3336 times
  
James Brown wrote in message ...
> 
> > * Delete lugnet.market.auction and lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade and • replace
> >  these with lugnet.market.forsale, lugnet.market.wanted, and • lugnet.market
> >  .swap?  Why or why not?
> 
> Hmm... as others have mentioned, .swap is not entirely clear how it's
> different from .wanted, and there would likely be a lot of x-posted.  How
> about just lugnet.market.foroffer and lugnet.market.wanted?
> 
> The only thing that personally bothers me about this is that I'll
> more-or-less stop reading the market groups.  I stopped reading .auction a
> while ago because the ratio of noise (things I wasn't interested in, mostly
> e-bay, but also lots of other auctions) to content was too high.  If .bst
> and .auction are effectively merged, then I highly suspect that the
> noise-to-signal ratio will be too high for me to put my time into it.  :/
> But personal preferences aside, it sounds like a better, more clear
> hierarchy, and so is probably a good thing.

I have to "me too" on this post. James has stated me feelings on this quite
well. I generally don't even go to auctions, but then I miss the personal
auctions that people run (which I would participate in). I would also (if
you combined the groups) abandon BST (if you combined the groups)  area
because the noise from Ebay would be so great.

BTW we added a skip filter to all Ebay messages in auction but so many
messages still get through that I generally don't even bother looking in
auction anymore.

Rose



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
 
(...) Sure. They can't hurt, and adding them gives you the coverage you need to toast the mostly obsolete dear-lego group. I'd suggest having them as just .rant and .rave instead of under the .lego.* hierarchy, to avoid implications that they're (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR