 | | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
|
(...) Just to add a comment, the whole thing seems rather anal retentive, doesn't it? Frankly, I am just glad to have input and feedback from LEGO company representatives, I don't care where they post from. The ONLY concern there should be from (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:3af9bf7c.297922...net.com... (...) was (...) when (...) We actually post two different ways, the web and off the news reader. I find the news reader method easier to use, but web posting isn't (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
|
(...) Suzanne and I disagree. However, we do plan to make it easier. (...) I wasn't taking a poll. (...) Listen, LEGO is getting a free ride here. There's no _burden_ to make it easier to post. However, I do agree that making it easier is a good (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
|
(...) Excuse me? I will when I get the time, thank you. As I'm sure you can imagine, this past month hasn't exactly been filled with tons and tons of free time. I'm also moving into a new place in three weeks. (...) I explained why the email address (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of Soccer Women's Team #3416?
|
|
(...) So fix it already. Until you do I suggest that what really matters is the *SIGNATURE* on the post. NOT the email address associated with it. (...) Guess what. I decided this was an offical statement by the sig. I didn't even look at the email (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
|
(...) Agreed. FUT admin.nntp (...) Again, agreed. Well said, Kevin. (23 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
Todd, you amaze more every time you add a new feature to LUGNET - I wish I was able to devote enough free time to do something like this :) Dan (23 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
(...) Hopefully along with a nastygram email back to the perpetrator asking them to not do that in future... :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
(...) I can't wait for the first one to appear. :) Then I can write a filter to filter them out automatically. (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
(...) Yes. However the flip side is that if they show up in the list, LOTS of people will see it and pummel the person to change their settings instead of just the person who posted the first post after the offender set their email to vacation mode. (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
(...) I just hope we would not see a lot of those Outlook out-of-office auto-reply to every single post in the group. (23 years ago, 22-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Now subscribe with Reply-To group or poster
|
|
Dear LUGNET News-by-Mail subscribers, I'm pleased to announce a new mail subscription feature... When you subscribe to a group by mail, you can now select whether you want to receive messages with replies directed to (a) just the poster/sender, or (...) (23 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) Yes, that would be fine, since we were discussing a more general "database" for Lego purposes and not the LUGNET database itself (for which there is lugnet.admin.database). I just hope that the discussion doesn't fizzle after only a couple of (...) (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) That would probably be more intuitive than lugnet.admin.database (or is that supposed to serve a different purpose). (23 years ago, 20-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) Oh -- d'Oh -- well, OK, we could make lugnet.db into a group. Would you find that useful for discussing database things? (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) Todd may have meant lugnet.admin.database. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting via mail
|
|
(...) The "database" group? Excuse my ignorance, but which group would that be? If I read my groupinfo correctly, the is no "parent" group to lugnet.db.* (no group lugnet.db): ht@katzenminze%pts/4 (20:43) ~ > telnet news.lugnet.com nntp Trying (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) How true that is! You are so correct. In fact... I'm not using a newsreader at all. I use the web interface exclusively. (...) Check here: (URL) on reading it, does seem to imply that it doesn't work "everywhere" only on the top level group. I (...) (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: a thought about brickbay update postings
|
|
(...) The web interface does have group skip filters. The groups are not coalesced for NNTP. (23 years ago, 19-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
