 | | Re: A letter to Todd —Henry Chea
|
| | | (...) I can't speak for the "majority of us", but I for one do not see how you could assume that the majority of the lugnet community believes that what Todd has done is wrong. Personally, when things are agreeable to me, I speak very little of it. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | (...) <snip everything> (...) Plesae note the title of this post, if you feel one way, great - but please post it on another thread. The vast majority of your post had nothing to do with anything in my post. And it was not an open letter. There is (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | (...) Just who do you think you are? If you want to talk to Todd, email him, especially if you do not want others to reply. Personally I wish you would shut up about LEGO's rights on LUGNET unless you have something constructive to say. Such as (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | | (...) Mark Papenfuss, thats who I know I am, never claimed to be anything official, or anything more than Mark Papenfuss. Were you unclear about who I am? (...) If you have been paying attention, Todd's response rate is below 50%, he is a busy man - (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) Mark, settle down. You're being a bit too demanding here, even though you might not see it. You posted a public letter, so you should expect others to reply. If you didn't want other replies, then don't post publicly. You can't get upset when (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | | (...) True, point taken - I was more to borrow a word "grated" that the reply had really nothing to do with the post - I know it would be impossible to keep people posting a reply to it, and posting that would only make people reply more - which it (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) Uh oh. Now the uproar is going to continue because you're only allowed to profane on LUGNET if you're in the good graces of the powers that be. And you're not. So I predict your posting privs will be yanked and you'll scream about being (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A letter to Todd —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) Mark, you posted a message to a public discussion group (several actually). If it was not meant to be an open letter, then perhaps you should have sent it directly to Todd via email. I do not think it was appropriate of you to inform Henry (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | |
