 | | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) It's a good thing then, that we have a group of police who carefully watch what's posted where, and correct and admonish as appropriate. Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
Hello! (...) With posts like yours: certainly. Bye Jojo (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
Todd, just a non-partisan comment here to say thank-you for making this post. Whether they agree or disagree with its content, I hope all the readers appreciate the fact that you provided some kind of "official statement". As a long time (albeit (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Well, if Todd didn't implement the group, and there was an uproar about that, I'd chime in and say *exactly* the same thing. But you don't know that about me.(1) It's Todd's backyard--if he says that the group gets added, the decision is made (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
|
|
(...) I can't say I agree-- by saying that, you're absolutely forcing LUGNET into a position of choosing a religion by arguing that something that's *unreligious* is a religion in and of itself. Hence, you could argue that nothing ever was (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) [SNIP] (...) [SNIP] (...) That right Dave, only one group us getting attention - nobody asked people their opinions or requested the other seven. 'Leave it alone/Life goes on/get over it.' - you libs (ie your West Wing marathon clues me in on (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP As these new groups now exist, I feel no need to continue the debate about them. I do want to point out the fallacy that Todd espouses here about being religious-neutral and religious beliefs (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
A big public thank-you to you, Todd, and the LUGNET Transition Team. I have subscribed to people.lgbt as a mailing list--my first! [LDrawPart 3004:373] -Teddy p.s. I guess I have a Yellow Brick Road to build now! (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Well said Todd. (...) May peace be unto you as well. Ray (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) Oh good golly--no one is shoving anything anyone's throat. They are new NGs under lugnet.people. You can skip 'em if you so desire. You never, not once, have to read them--ever. You never have to see 'em, partake in 'em, converse with 'em, or (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
This entire subject, and everything related to its disgusts me. None of these news groups should have been created, period. This is supposed to be a site about LEGO, not the livestyles of the people that are involved with Legos. I don't care if you (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Serious group requests
|
|
I have a question / suggestion. Why not change the default settings on the main message display list to include only theme and local groups? The thought behind this is to create a kid-friendly default view of LUGNET. I know this opens a lot of worm (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) And I completely concur--there were 8 new NG's, and yet one is getting all the attention. If people weren't pointing at it, or highlighting it, or yapping about it, nobody would have noticed it. There is no elephant in the livingroom--all this (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) The difference being that there was a request for the lgbt group. (...) They are only on the front page because ENOUGH LUGNET MEMBERS THOUGHT THEY WERE IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO HIGHLIGHT THEM!! It is not because the group is there. The whole (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) You don't have to listen, Tim. That is the point. Now, I know I read things differently than some. I use the web interface and not NNTP. So, I don't get deluged with information--I have to go get it. I think the only thing here I am actually (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) So if LUGNET is religion neutral, why can't it be sexually neutral too? If you don't see a need for a religious-oriented group, it follows that there's no need for this type of group either. You talk about how people can simply not look at (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) If you make a serious suggestion to implement those groups (and any others you feel would be useful), I'm sure it would be considered. I'm also sure the response to such a suggestion would be taken into that consideration, just as I assume it (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Call me soppy, but I choked up reading this bit. Todd - thanks. A lot. Kevin (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
<MAJOR SNIPPAGE> (...) </MAJOR SNIPPAGE> A suggestion to help encourage the religious aspects LEGO and LEGO collectors would be to make a .religion group. Another group that could have a necessity here is a .politics group. If it's not only about (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Why these news groups were created
|
|
Long ago, when lugnet.people was created, the idea of subgroups was entertained. Possible subgroups envisioned at the time included Kids, Teens, Parents, and NSLOs. At the time, LUGNET was still small, and it was felt that creating these subgroups (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
